ArticleWiener klinische Wochenschrift2019
Childhood tuberculosis in Vienna between 2010 and 2016.
Article in Wiener klinische Wochenschrift, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTuberculosis (TB) has become a rare disease in developed countries. Austria is a low incidence country for TB with an incidence rate of 7.2/100,000 in 2016. The incidence of TB has shown a constant decline in Austria from 2008 (9.8/100,000) to 2015 (6.7/100,000) but recently stagnated in 2016 (7.2/100,000). In recent years migration to Austria from countries with high TB incidence rates has increased. Therefore, this study aimed to describe the recent epidemiology of childhood TB in Vienna.
methodsData of pediatric patients with active TB infections, who were hospitalized for further investigations or isolation precautions between 2010 and 2016 at the Wilhelminenspital, Austria's reference center for childhood tuberculosis, were retrospectively analyzed. Demographic and clinical data (symptoms, microbiology, radiology, immunology) were collected, compared and evaluated.
resultsA total of 127 patients with active tuberculosis were included in the study. The number of admissions varied between n = 7 in 2010 and n = 26 in 2016. There were two age peaks of infected children (0-5 years: n = 41 and 15-18 years: n = 45). In 35% of the cases one parent had active TB and was suspected to be the index case. In 36% the source of infection remained unknown. Compared to young children (<5 years), adolescents (15-18 years) showed proportionally more TB-related symptoms, such as cough (41% vs. 24%), fever (15% vs. 14%) and weight loss (22% vs. 0%). At the time of admission 51% of the young children and 33% of the adolescents were free of symptoms. Intrathoracic disease was found in 80.8%, extrathoracic disease in 19.2% and 11% of the cases were tuberculous lymphadenitis. Of the patients with intrathoracic TB 54% (n = 64) had a positive microbiological result (auramine staining, bacteriological culture, PCR). In young children hilar lymphadenopathy was the most frequent radiological finding (50%), whereas in adolescents lung infiltrates were most common (36%). The sensitivity of interferon-gamma release assays (IGRA) was 0.94 compared to 0.88 of the tuberculin skin test (TST). Both test methods showed moderate concordance (ϕ-coefficient = 0.48).
conclusionA high number of asymptomatic children and adolescents with active TB were observed, which underlines the importance of efficient screening measures. Thorough history taking in all patients with TB is essential to maximize the effect of contact tracing. Overall, infection rates remained consistently low during the observation period.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.