Trial reportEuropean journal of applied physiology2019
High-intensity interval training in cardiac resynchronization therapy: a randomized control trial.
Trial report in European journal of applied physiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02413151 (Exercise Training Following Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Exercise Training Following Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for adults with heart failure.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024Pooled it
- Pooled it
- A systematic review of rehabilitation in chronic heart failure: evaluating the reporting of exercise interventions.ESC heart failure · 2021Pooled it
- Exercise rehabilitation in cardiac resynchronization: systematic review and a meta-analysis.Heart failure reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Efficacy and Safety of Exercise Rehabilitation for Heart Failure Patients With Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in physiology · 2020Pooled it
- Effects of Endurance and Resistance Training on Cardiovascular Outcomes and Quality of Life in Patients with Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction: A Structured Narrative Review.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2025Review
- Cardiac rehabilitation for participants with implantable cardiac devices: A systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention · 2024Review
- Safety and feasibility of a telemonitoring-guided exercise program in patients receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy.Annals of noninvasive electrocardiology : the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc · 2022Article
- Comprehensive multicomponent cardiac rehabilitation in cardiac implantable electronic devices recipients: a consensus document from the European Association of Preventive Cardiology (EAPC; Secondary prevention and rehabilitation section) and European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA).Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
aimsTo determine the effects of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) following cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) implantation in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF), on noninvasive estimates of systolic ventricular function, exercise performance, severity of symptoms and quality of life.
methodsCardiopulmonary exercise testing, resting transthoracic echocardiogram and health-related quality of life assessment were obtained before and at 6 months after CRT implantation in 37 patients with moderate-to-severe CHF. Patients were randomized after CRT to either a 24-week HIIT group (90-95% peak heart rate, 2 days per week) or to a usual care group (CON). Mixed design 2 × 2 repeated measures ANOVA were used to test for differences within and in-between groups.
resultsImprovements in health-related quality of life (HIIT = 98.54%, CON = 123.47%), NYHA class (HIIT = 43.44%, CON = 38.30%) HR recovery at minute 1 (HIIT = 32.32%, CON = 42.94%), pulse pressure at peak effort (HIIT = 14.06%, CON = 9.52%, LVEF (HIIT = 42.17%, CON = 51.10%) and LV Mass (HIIT = 13.26%, CON = 11.88%) were similar in both groups (p > 0.05). Significant increases in CPET duration in the HIIT group (25.94%), and increases in peak VO
conclusionSix months of HIIT in patients in CRT did not further improved indices of functional capacity and health-related quality of life, and LV structure and function, compared to CRT alone. However, HIIT led to further improvements in exercise performance. It remains unclear whether HIIT benefits patients in CRT to a similar degree as more conventional forms of exercise training previously shown to maximize benefits in CRT. CLINICAL
trial registrationhttp://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT02413151.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.