ArticleDer Internist2019
[Atrioventricular block and left ventricular wall mobility disorder in a 44-year-old female patient : A case report of a rarity with pitfalls].
Article in Der Internist, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Eosinophilic myocarditis complicated by permanent atrioventricular nodal block: a case report.European heart journal. Case reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Eosinophilic myocarditis is a rare condition with good treatment options, which can be difficult to diagnose. The clinical presentation can vary from asymptomatic to life-threatening forms. This article describes the case of a 44-year-old woman who suffered from vertigo, chest pain and dyspnea. The woman presented with an intermittent atrioventricular (AV) block II Mobitz type II° and mild impairment of left ventricular ejection fraction. Hypereosinophilia in the peripheral blood, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and endomyocardial biopsy led to the diagnosis of eosinophilic myocarditis, most likely as a result of an allergic reaction to Aspergillus fumigatus. A general treatment recommendation cannot be made due to the lack of evidence-based guidelines; however, recent scientific studies confirmed timely, high-dose steroid administration over several months to be the mainstay of treatment of eosinophilic myocarditis. The following article may be helpful in the early diagnosis and treatment of this underdiagnosed and insidious disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.