Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31123754›Full record

Observational studyNicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco2020

Tobacco Cessation in Affordable Care Act Medicaid Expansion States Versus Non-expansion States.

Steffani R Bailey, Miguel Marino, David Ezekiel-Herrera, Teresa Schmidt, Heather Angier, Megan J Hoopes, Jennifer E DeVoe, John Heintzman, Nathalie Huguet

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02936609 (Assessing Community Cancer Care After Insurance ExpanSionS), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02936609 completednot on this map

Assessing Community Cancer Care After Insurance ExpanSionS

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorOHSU Knight Cancer InstituteRan2016 to 2021Enrolled1,939,783ConditionsCancerArmsMedicaid Expansion
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Cervical Cancer Screening and Prevention among Latinas in the United States among a Network of Community Health Centers.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Observational
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Steffani R BaileyDepartment of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR.
Miguel MarinoDepartment of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR.
David Ezekiel-HerreraDepartment of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR.
Teresa SchmidtOCHIN, Inc., Portland, OR.
Heather AngierDepartment of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR.
Megan J HoopesOCHIN, Inc., Portland, OR.
Jennifer E DeVoeDepartment of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR.
John HeintzmanDepartment of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR.
Nathalie HuguetDepartment of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR.

Funding

Community-based HIT Tools for Cancer Screening and Health Insurance PromotionR01CA181452 · NCI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI DEVOE, JENNIFER E · 2014 to 2018
$3.1M
Evaluating Control of Hypertension - Effect of Social Determinants (ECHOES)R01HL136575 · NHLBI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI DEVOE, JENNIFER E · 2018 to 2021
$2.5M
ACCESS: Assessing Community Cancer care after insurance ExpanSionSR01CA204267 · NCI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI DEVOE, JENNIFER E · 2016 to 2020
$2.0M
Meaningful Use and Treatment of Smoking in Federally-Qualified Health CentersK23DA037453 · NIDA · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI BAILEY, STEFFANI R · 2015 to 2019
$841k
Post Affordable Care Act: Evaluation of Community Health Centers (PACE)R01HS024270 · AHRQ · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI DEVOE, JENNIFER E · 2015 to 2016
$796k
AHRQ HHS R01 HS024270NCI NIH HHS R01 CA181452NCI NIH HHS R01 CA204267NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL136575NIDA NIH HHS K23 DA037453
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCommunity health centers (CHCs) care for vulnerable patients who use tobacco at higher than national rates. States that expanded Medicaid eligibility under the Affordable Care Act (ACA) provided insurance coverage to tobacco users not previously Medicaid-eligible, thereby potentially increasing their odds of receiving cessation assistance. We examined if tobacco users in Medicaid expansion states had increased quit rates, cessation medications ordered, and greater health care utilization compared to patients in non-expansion states.

methodsUsing electronic health record (EHR) data from 219 CHCs in 10 states that expanded Medicaid as of January 1, 2014, we identified patients aged 19-64 with tobacco use status documented in the EHR within 6 months prior to ACA Medicaid expansion and ≥1 visit with tobacco use status assessed within 24 months post-expansion (January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2015). We propensity score matched these patients to tobacco users from 108 CHCs in six non-expansion states (n = 27 670 matched pairs; 55 340 patients). Using a retrospective observational cohort study design, we compared odds of having a quit status, cessation medication ordered, and ≥6 visits within the post-expansion period among patients in expansion versus non-expansion states.

resultsPatients in expansion states had increased adjusted odds of quitting (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.35, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.28-1.43), having a medication ordered (aOR = 1.53, 95% CI: 1.44-1.62), and having ≥6 follow-up visits (aOR = 1.34, 95% CI: 1.28-1.41) compared to patients from non-expansion states.

conclusionsIncreased access to insurance via the ACA Medicaid expansion likely led to increased quit rates within this vulnerable population. IMPLICATIONS: CHCs care for vulnerable patients at higher risk of tobacco use than the general population. Medicaid expansion via the ACA provided insurance coverage to a large number of tobacco users not previously Medicaid-eligible. We found that expanded insurance coverage was associated with increased cessation assistance and higher odds of tobacco cessation. Continued provision of insurance coverage could lead to increased quit rates among high-risk populations, resulting in improvements in population health outcomes and reduced total health care costs.

Indexed as

AdultCommunity Health CentersElectronic Health RecordsFemaleHumansInsurance CoverageMaleMedicaidMiddle AgedPatient Acceptance of Health CarePatient Protection and Affordable Care ActRetrospective StudiesTobacco Use CessationUnited StatesVulnerable PopulationsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID31123754
PMCPMC7249916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.