Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31123724›Full record

ArticleJCO precision oncology2019

Genomic Characterization of Prostatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Identifies a High Prevalence of DNA Repair Gene Mutations.

Michael T Schweizer, Emmanuel S Antonarakis, Tarek A Bismar, Liana B Guedes, Heather H Cheng, Maria S Tretiakova, Funda Vakar-Lopez, Nola Klemfuss, Eric Q Konnick, Elahe A Mostaghel and 8 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JCO precision oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 92 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Open veterinary journal · 2024
    Article
  10. Role of NOncology reports · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. 2023 Canadian Urological Association guideline: Genetic testing in prostate cancer.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2023
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Michael T Schweizer *University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Emmanuel S Antonarakis *Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.
Tarek A BismarUniversity of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Liana B GuedesJohns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.
Heather H ChengUniversity of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Maria S TretiakovaUniversity of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Funda Vakar-LopezUniversity of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Nola KlemfussFred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA.
Eric Q KonnickUniversity of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Elahe A MostaghelUniversity of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Andrew C HsiehFred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA.
Peter S NelsonFred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA.
Evan Y YuUniversity of Washington, Seattle, WA.
R Bruce MontgomeryUniversity of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Lawrence D TrueUniversity of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Jonathan I EpsteinJohns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.
Tamara L Lotan *Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.
Colin C Pritchard *University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
University of Washington · USFred Hutch Cancer Center · USJohns Hopkins University · USUniversity of Calgary · CA

Funding

Translational Bioimaging Core Shared ResourceP30CA015704 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI Marian Esvelt · 1985 to 2026
$296.4M
Translational Research Central ServicesP30CA006973 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Rosalie Wollett · 1985 to 2026
$208.6M
TRANSCRIPTOME AND PROTEOME STRATIFICATION OF PROSTATE ADENOCARCINOMA PHENOTYPESP50CA097186 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI John Kyung Lee · 2002 to 2026
$58.1M
Hormone signaling and translation control in advanced prostate cancerR37CA230617 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI HSIEH, ANDREW CALEB · 2019 to 2025
$3.1M
The aberrant androgen receptor underlies abiraterone/enzalutamide resistanceR01CA185297 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI ANTONARAKIS, EMMANUEL S., LUO, JUN · 2015 to 2018
$1.5M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA006973NCI NIH HHS P30 CA015704NCI NIH HHS P50 CA097186NCI NIH HHS R01 CA185297NCI NIH HHS R37 CA230617
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDuctal prostate cancer (dPC) is a rare variant of prostatic adenocarcinoma associated with poor outcomes. Although its histopathologic features are well characterized, the underlying molecular hallmarks of this aggressive subtype are not well described. We sought to provide a comprehensive overview of the spectrum of mutations associated with dPC.

methodsThree case series across multiple institutions were assembled. All patients had a diagnosis of dPC, and histopathologic classification was confirmed by an expert genitourinary pathologist. Case series 1 included men who were prospectively enrolled in a tumor sequencing study at the University of Washington (n = 22). Case series 2 and 3 included archival samples from men treated at Johns Hopkins Hospital (n = 21) and University of Calgary (n = 8), respectively. Tumor tissue was sequenced on a targeted next-generation sequencing assay, UW-OncoPlex, according to previously published methods. The frequency of pathogenic/likely pathogenic mutations are reported.

resultsOverall, 25 patients (49%) had at least one DNA damage repair gene alteration, including seven (14%) with a mismatch repair gene mutation and 16 (31%) with a homologous repair mutation. Germline autosomal dominant mutations were confirmed or suspected in 10 patients (20%). Activating mutations in the PI3K pathway (n = 19; 37%), WNT pathway (n = 16; 31%), and MAPK pathway (n = 8; 16%) were common.

conclusionThis study strongly suggests that dPCs are enriched for actionable mutations, with approximately 50% of patients demonstrating DNA damage repair pathway alteration(s). Patients with dPC should be offered next-generation sequencing to guide standard-of-care treatment (eg, immune checkpoint inhibitors) or triaged toward an appropriate clinical trial (eg, poly [ADP-ribose] polymerase inhibitors).

Identifiers

PMID31123724
PMCPMC6528668
OpenAlexW2936145201

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.