Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31123631›Full record

ArticleSurgical neurology international2019

The pCONUS bifurcation aneurysm implants for endovascular treatment of adults with intracranial aneurysms: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Thomas J Sorenson, Marta Iacobucci, Mohammad H Murad, Laurent Spelle, Jacques Moret, Giuseppe Lanzino

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical neurology international, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Endoluminal flow diverters in the treatment of sidewall and bifurcation aneurysm: A systematic review and meta-analysis of complications and angiographic outcomes.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Efficacy and safety of PulseRider for treatment of wide-necked intracranial aneurysm-A systematic review and meta-analysis.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. [Brain aneurysms treatment with pCONus2 device. Initial experience at IMSS].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Intrasaccular neck-bridging: A technical note on Nautilus-assisted coiling of wide-necked cerebral aneurysms. Feasibility study, immediate and early angiographic results.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2022
    Article
  11. Long-term follow-up of the pCONus device for the treatment of wide-neck bifurcation aneurysms.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2022
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. pCONUS 2 and pCONUS 2-HPC for the treatment of wide-necked intracranial aneurysms: Periprocedural, 6-month, and early 2-year follow-up outcomes.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Thomas J SorensonSchool of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Marta IacobucciDepartment of Interventional Neuroradiology, NEURI Center, Bicêtre Hospital, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France.
Mohammad H MuradCenter for Science of Healthcare Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Laurent SpelleDepartment of Interventional Neuroradiology, NEURI Center, Bicêtre Hospital, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France.
Jacques MoretDepartment of Interventional Neuroradiology, NEURI Center, Bicêtre Hospital, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France.
Giuseppe LanzinoDepartment of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe authors sought to assess the safety and early efficacy of the pCONUS Bifurcation Aneurysm Implants in a meaningful number of patients; we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis for the treatment of 203 intracranial aneurysms.

methodsA literature search was performed by a reference librarian, and after screening nine case series were included in this analysis. We estimated from each study the cumulative incidence (event rate) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for each outcome. Event rates were pooled in a meta-analysis across studies using the random-effects model; descriptive statistics were reported when relevant.

resultsThe pCONUS devices can be used with a technical success rate of 100% (95% CI: 0.98-1.00) and a technical complication rate of 0% (95% CI: 0.00-0.02). Perioperative morbidity and mortality rates were 7% (95% CI: 0.03-0.11) and 0% (95% CI: 0.00-0.01), respectively. Perioperative hemorrhage rate was 0% (95% CI: 0.00-0.02); rate of treatment-related long-term neurological deficit was 2% (95% CI: 0.00-0.06). The long-term complete occlusion rate was 60% (95% CI: 0.52-0.69) and retreatment rate was 14% (95% CI: 0.06-0.22).

conclusionsThe pCONUS devices are an additional tool for the treatment of wide-necked intracranial aneurysms with high rates of technical success and sufficiently low rates of morbidity and mortality. Comparative studies with longer-term follow-up are needed to clarify the role of this device in the management of challenging aneurysms.

Indexed as

AneurysmcoilingendovascularpCONUSstentwide neck

Identifiers

PMID31123631
PMCPMC6416758

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.