ArticleSurgical neurology international2019
Preliminary experience in the management of brain and skull-base tumors with microwave ablation; feasibility guided by ultrasound, report from 23 cases.
Article in Surgical neurology international, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advancements and challenges in brain cancer therapeutics.Exploration (Beijing, China) · 2024Review
- Solitary plasmacytoma of the sacrum treated with microwave ablation in conjunction with high dose of dexamethasone: A case report and review of the literature.Surgical neurology international · 2023Article
- Complex Permittivity of Ex-Vivo Human, Bovine and Porcine Brain Tissues in the Microwave Frequency Range.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Juvenile angiolipoma in the subtemporal region, zygomatic, and pterygomaxillary fossa treated by microwave ablation - A case study and literature review.Surgical neurology international · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn surgery involving brain tumors, the use of new tools or equipment that allows for better results and improvement in the quality of life of the patients is mandatory. Microwave ablation (MWA) is a technique that has been used effectively since 1994 in the management of different kinds of tumors. The authors present their surgical experience with 23 cases of brain and skull-base tumors using MWA technique.
methodsIn all, 23 cases diagnosed with brain and skull-base tumors are described; all of these were treated with MWA as unique technique as a complement to conventional microsurgical tumor resection. In all cases, ultrasound imaging guidance was used. A thin antenna (caliber 14.5; MedWaves) was positioned through ultrasound images to a central intratumoral area, and then energy was applied for 1-3 min until the temperature sensor in the proximal position of the antenna reached 80-100°C. Through transoperative Doppler ultrasound images and surgical microscopy, changes in the generated ablation were observed. The said ablation led to a decrease in intratumoral blood flow, and the adjacent vascular and cerebral structures were preserved.
resultsThe application of MWA during brain surgery was regarded as safe in all cases, as no permanent additional neurological deficit was detected. Intratumoral vascular flow was also reduced and tumor resection was facilitated. Likewise, a reduction in tumor volume was noted, and in others in whom the ablation was applied as a single therapy, a progressive destruction of the tumor was observed.
conclusionMWA can be a useful tool as a single therapy or as a complement to conventional techniques for the surgical resection of brain and skull-base tumors. It was a safe method in all cases, producing a decrease in intratumoral blood flow, and this procedure facilitates the microsurgical resection of the lesion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.