Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31123618›Full record

ArticleCurrent health sciences journal

A Primary Retroperitoneal Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: A Challenging Diagnosis.

A Constantin, A D Tănase, A Săftoiu, C Copăescu

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Current health sciences journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

A ConstantinGastroenterology Department, Ponderas Academic Hospital, Bucharest, Romania.
A D TănaseBone Marrow Transplantation Unit, Fundeni Clinical Institute, Bucharest, Romania.
A SăftoiuGastroenterology Department, Gastro Center Craiova, Romania.
C CopăescuSurgical Department, Ponderas Academic Hospital Bucharest, Romania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although quite rare, retroperitoneum can harbour malignant limphomas. On the grounds that the anatomical location is uncommon and the symptoms are scarce, the diagnosis is usually late and challenging. Imaging methods such as magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography (CT) and positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT), can characterize and locate the tumor while endoscopic ultrasound fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) may provide pathological confirmation. We present the clinical case of a fifty-five-year-old female that is admitted to our hospital with epigastric discomfort, nausea and vomiting. CT showed a homogenously enhancing mass lesion that encased the pancreas, in contact with the portal vein, inferior vena cava, invading splenomesenteric confluence. To investigate further, EUS-FNA was decided and it revealed lymphocyte proliferation suggestive for the diagnosis of lymphoma. Hereinafter, surgical intervention was performed and immunohistochemical analysis and sub classification of lymphoma was obtained. The final diagnosis was non-Hodgkin lymphoma, Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL). Poly-chemotherapy with R-CHOP was initiated. At the end of the treatment fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) was performed and no pathological findings were found. A brief review of literature is also provided.

Indexed as

contrast-enhanced computer tomography (CT)-guidedEndoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA)FDG-PETlymph nodes biopsy, retroperitoneal lymphoma

Identifiers

PMID31123618
PMCPMC6421481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.