Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31123609›Full record

ArticleCurrent health sciences journal

Evaluation of Gastric Carcinomas Histological Patterns in Relation to Tumors Aggressiveness Parameters.

M Dobrițoiu, A E Stepan, C C Vere, C E Simionescu

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Current health sciences journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

M DobrițoiuPhD, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova.
A E StepanDepartment of Pathology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova.
C C VereDepartment of Gastroenterology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova.
C E SimionescuDepartment of Pathology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gastric carcinomas are frequent tumors with variable growth patterns that may interfere with the evaluation of histopathological prognostic parameters of the lesions. In this study we analyzed the incidence and statistical relation of histological growth patterns depending on the prognostic parameters of gastric carcinomas for 95 cases. Pure forms were present in 82.2% of cases, from which more frequent subtypes were low grade tubular carcinomas and poorly cohesive with signet-ring cells carcinomas. Mixed forms were present in 17.8% of cases, with the highest incidence of tumors containing well differentiated tubular carcinoma and poorly differentiated papillary carcinoma areas. Analysis of the identified types and subtypes in relation to the histological prognostic parameters indicated significant differences regarding the tumor stage, the mixed subtypes being more frequent in advanced stages. Although mixed subtypes were more commonly associated with vascular and perineural invasion, the aspects were statistically insignificant. Together with tumor stage, the lymphovascular and/or perineural invasion should be taken into consideration as prognostic indicators in the postoperative management of gastric cancer.

Indexed as

Gastric carcinomahistological patternprognostic parameters

Identifiers

PMID31123609
PMCPMC6421475

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.