Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31123558›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of gastrointestinal surgery2019

Pancreatic necrosis: Complications and changing trend of treatment.

Mamoon Ur Rashid, Ishtiaq Hussain, Sundas Jehanzeb, Waqas Ullah, Saeed Ali, Akriti Gupta Jain, Neelam Khetpal, Sarfraz Ahmad

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of gastrointestinal surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Mamoon Ur RashidDepartment of Internal Medicine, Advent Health Graduate Medical Education, Orlando, FL 32804, United States. mamoon.rashid.md@adventhealth.com.
Ishtiaq HussainDepartment of Gastroenterology, Cleveland Clinic, Weston, FL 33326, United States.
Sundas JehanzebDepartment of Gastroenterology, Cleveland Clinic, Weston, FL 33326, United States.
Waqas UllahInternal Medicine, Abington Hospital, Abington, PA 19001, United States.
Saeed AliDepartment of Internal Medicine, Advent Health Graduate Medical Education, Orlando, FL 32804, United States.
Akriti Gupta JainDepartment of Internal Medicine, Advent Health Graduate Medical Education, Orlando, FL 32804, United States.
Neelam KhetpalDepartment of Internal Medicine, Advent Health Graduate Medical Education, Orlando, FL 32804, United States.
Sarfraz AhmadDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Advent Health Cancer Institute, Orlando, FL 32804, United States.
Cleveland Clinic Florida · USAbington Memorial Hospital · USMarymount University · USFlorida Hospital Cancer Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Incidence of acute pancreatitis seems to be increasing in the Western countries and has been associated with significantly increased morbidity. Nearly 80% of the patients with acute pancreatitis undergo resolution; some develop complications including pancreatic necrosis. Infection of pancreatic necrosis is the leading cause of death in these patients. A significant portion of these patients needs surgical interventions. Traditionally, the "gold standard" procedure has been the open surgical necrosectomy, which is now being completed by the relatively lesser invasive interventions. Minimally invasive surgical (MIS) procedures include endoscopic drainage, percutaneous image-guided catheter drainage, and retroperitoneal drainage. This review article discusses the open and MIS interventions for pancreatic necrosis with each having its own respective benefits and disadvantages are covered.

Indexed as

ComplicationsMinimally invasive surgeryNecrosectomyOpen surgeryPancreatic necrosisReview articleTreatment

Identifiers

PMID31123558
PMCPMC6513789
OpenAlexW2941217535

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.