ArticleBiomicrofluidics2019
Scalable high-throughput acoustophoresis in arrayed plastic microchannels.
Article in Biomicrofluidics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Two-stage inertial microfluidics enrichment of activated T-cells towards a bead-less chimeric antigen receptor manufacturing protocol.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2026Article
- Numerical analysis of a multiproduct biorefinery on a chip: Exploiting acoustic waves to process the microalgae Tisochrysis lutea.Ultrasonics sonochemistry · 2025Article
- Microparticles with tunable, cell-like properties for quantitative acoustic mechanophenotyping.Microsystems & nanoengineering · 2023Article
- Constant-Power versus Constant-Voltage Actuation in Frequency Sweeps for Acoustofluidic Applications.Micromachines · 2022Article
- Rosette-induced separation of T cells by acoustophoresis.Biomicrofluidics · 2022Article
- Single-Cell Microgels for Diagnostics and Therapeutics.Advanced functional materials · 2021Article
- Effect of elastic modulus on inertial displacement of cell-like particles in microchannels.Biomicrofluidics · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microfluidic acoustophoresis is a label-free technique that isolates a purified product from a complex mixture of cells. This technique is well-studied but thus far has lacked the throughput and device manufacturability needed for many medical and industrial uses. Scale-up of acoustofluidic devices can be more challenging than in other microfluidic systems because the channel walls are integral to the resonant behavior and coupling to neighboring channels can inhibit performance. Additionally, the increased device area needed for parallel channels becomes less practical in the silicon or glass materials usually used for acoustofluidic devices. Here, we report an acoustic separator with 12 parallel channels made entirely from polystyrene that achieves blood cell separation at a flow rate greater than 1 ml/min. We discuss the design and optimization of the device and the electrical drive parameters and compare the separation performance using channels of two different designs. To demonstrate the utility of the device, we test its ability to purify lymphocytes from apheresis product, a process that is critical to new immunotherapies used to treat blood cancers. We process a leukapheresis sample with a volume greater than 100 ml in less than 2 h in a single pass without interruption, achieving greater than 90% purity of lymphocytes, without any prepurification steps. These advances suggest that acoustophoresis could in the future aid in cell therapy bioprocessing and that further scale-up is possible.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.