ArticleJournal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A, (Statistics in Society)2018
Bayesian joint modelling of longitudinal data on abstinence, frequency and intensity of drinking in alcoholism trials.
Article in Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A, (Statistics in Society), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Three-part random effect models for longitudinal skewed survey data with "not applicable" responses.Journal of educational and behavioral statistics : a quarterly publication sponsored by the American Educational Research Association and the American Statistical Association · 2025Article
- Joint modelling of longitudinal data: a scoping review of methodology and applications for non-time to event data.BMC medical research methodology · 2025Article
- Joint modeling the frequency and duration of accelerometer-measured physical activity from a lifestyle intervention trial.Statistics in medicine · 2023Article
- Joint modelling of longitudinal response and time-to-event data using conditional distributions: a Bayesian perspective.Journal of applied statistics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In alcoholism research, several complementary outcomes are of interest:abstinence from drinking during a specific time frame, and, when the individual is drinking, frequency of drinking (the proportion of days on which drinking occurs) and intensity of drinking (the average number of drinks per drinking day). The outcomes are often measured repeatedly over time on the same subject and, although they are closely related, they are rarely modelled together. We propose a joint model that allows us to fit these longitudinal outcomes simultaneously, using correlated random effects to model the association between the outcomes and between repeated measurements on the same subject. The model has three parts: a logistic part for sustained abstinence over the period of interest, a truncated binomial part for frequency of drinking and a log-normal model for drinking intensity when drinking occurs. Because of the computational impracticality of fitting models with many random effects by using standard frequentist approaches, we use a Bayesian approach to fit the joint model. We also conduct a simulation study to investigate the gains in parameter estimate bias and mean-squared error associated with joint
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.