Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31123296›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Vaginal Microbiota Composition Correlates Between Pap Smear Microscopy and Next Generation Sequencing and Associates to Socioeconomic Status.

Seppo Virtanen, Tiina Rantsi, Anni Virtanen, Kaisa Kervinen, Pekka Nieminen, Ilkka Kalliala, Anne Salonen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Seppo VirtanenObstetrics and Gynecology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0261-8958
Tiina RantsiObstetrics and Gynecology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Anni VirtanenDepartment of Pathology, University of Helsinki and HUSLAB, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Kaisa KervinenObstetrics and Gynecology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Pekka NieminenObstetrics and Gynecology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Ilkka KallialaObstetrics and Gynecology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Anne SalonenHuman Microbiome Research Program, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland. anne.salonen@helsinki.fi.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6960-7447
University of Helsinki · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent research on vaginal microbiota relies on high throughput sequencing while microscopic methods have a long history in clinical use. We investigated the correspondence between microscopic findings of Pap smears and the vaginal microbiota composition determined by next generation sequencing among 50 asymptomatic women. Both methods produced coherent results regarding the distinction between Lactobacillus-dominant versus mixed microbiota, reassuring gynaecologists for the use of Pap smear or wet mount microscopy for rapid evaluation of vaginal bacteria as part of diagnosis. Cytologic findings identified women with bacterial vaginosis and revealed that cytolysis of vaginal epithelial cells is associated to Lactobacillus crispatus-dominated microbiota. Education and socio-economic status were associated to the vaginal microbiota variation. Our results highlight the importance of including socio-economic status as a co-factor in future vaginal microbiota studies.

Indexed as

AdultBacteriaEpithelial CellsFemaleFinlandGardnerella vaginalisHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansLactobacillusMicrobiotaMicroscopyPapanicolaou TestReproducibility of ResultsRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSocial ClassVaginaRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID31123296
PMCPMC6533281
OpenAlexW2945118463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.