Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31123079›Full record

ArticleGenome research2019

The

Adam D Warner, Louis Gevirtzman, LaDeana W Hillier, Brent Ewing, Robert H Waterston

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. ThemicroPublication biology · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Hand Dissection of Caenorhabditis elegans Intestines.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. TruncatedScience advances · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. A lineage-resolved molecular atlas ofScience (New York, N.Y.) · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Adam D WarnerDepartment of Genome Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA.
Louis GevirtzmanDepartment of Genome Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA.
LaDeana W HillierDepartment of Genome Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA.
Brent EwingDepartment of Genome Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA.
Robert H WaterstonDepartment of Genome Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA.
University of Washington · US

Funding

Automated single-cell expression analysis in C. elegansR01GM072675 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI WATERSTON, ROBERT H · 2005 to 2017
$7.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM072675
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have used RNA-seq in

Indexed as

Alternative SplicingTranscriptomeAnimalsCaenorhabditis elegansComputational BiologyEmbryonic DevelopmentExonsGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalIntronsMolecular Sequence AnnotationOrgan SpecificityRNA EditingRNA Splice SitesRNA Splice Sites

Identifiers

PMID31123079
PMCPMC6581053
OpenAlexW2944893167

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.