Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31122995›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

Proactive healthcare for frail elderly persons: study protocol for a prospective controlled primary care intervention in Sweden.

Jan Marcusson, Magnus Nord, Maria M Johansson, Jenny Alwin, Lars-Åke Levin, Petra Dannapfel, Kristin Thomas, Bonnie Poksinska, Annette Sverker, Anna Olaison and 11 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03180606 (Enhanced Primary Care for Elderly), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03180606 completednot on this map

Enhanced Primary Care for Elderly: A Multicenter Pragmatic Clinical Trial Where Older People With Great Needs Are Predicted and Given Personalized Primary Care

TypeobservationalSponsorRegion ÖstergötlandRan2017 to 2019Enrolled1,304ConditionsFrail Elderly SyndromeArmsMulti-disciplinary and personalized primary care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Pain Characteristics and Quality of Life in Older People at High Risk of Future Hospitalization.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jan MarcussonAcute Internal Medicine and Geriatrics and Departmentof Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-6452-3930
Magnus NordFamily Medicine, Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Maria M JohanssonAcute Internal Medicine and Geriatrics and Departmentof Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Jenny AlwinHealth Care Analysis, Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Lars-Åke LevinHealth Care Analysis, Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Petra DannapfelAcute Internal Medicine and Geriatrics and Departmentof Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Kristin ThomasDepartment of Medicine and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Bonnie PoksinskaDepartment of Management and Engineering, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Annette SverkerRehabilitation Medicine, Department of Medicine and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Anna OlaisonDepartment of Social and Welfare Studies, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Elisabet CedersundAgeing and Social Change, Department of Social and Welfare Studies, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Susanne KelfveDepartment of Social and Welfare Studies, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Andreas Motel-KlingebielDepartment of Social and Welfare Studies, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Ingrid HellströmDepartment of Social and Welfare Studies, Faculty of Health Sciences, Norrköping University, Norrköping, Sweden.
Agneta KullbergDepartment of Social and Welfare Studies, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Ylva BöttigerClinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Huan-Ji DongDepartment of Medicine and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Anneli PeolssonPhysiotherapy, Department of Medicine and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-6075-4432
Malin WassResearch and Development Unit in Region Östergötland, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Johan LythResearch and Development Unit in Region Östergötland, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Agneta AnderssonResearch and Development Unit in Region Östergötland, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Linköping University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe provision of healthcare services is not dedicated to promoting maintenance of function and does not target frail older persons at high risk of the main causes of morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of a proactive medical and social intervention in comparison with conventional care on a group of persons aged 75 and older selected by statistical prediction. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: In a pragmatic multicentre primary care setting (n=1600), a prediction model to find elderly (75+) persons at high risk of complex medical care or hospitalisation is used, followed by proactive medical and social care, in comparison with usual care. The study started in April 2017 with a run-in period until December 2017, followed by a 2-year continued intervention phase that will continue until the end of December 2019. The intervention includes several tools (multiprofessional team for rehabilitation, social support, medical care home visits and telephone support). Primary outcome measures are healthcare cost, number of hospital care episodes, hospital care days and mortality. Secondary outcome measures are number of outpatient visits, cost of social care and informal care, number of prescribed drugs, health-related quality of life, cost-effectiveness, sense of security, functional status and ability. We also study the care of elderly persons in a broader sense, by covering the perspectives of the patients, the professional staff and the management, and on a political level, by using semistructured interviews, qualitative methods and a questionnaire. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Approved by the regional ethical review board in Linköping (Dnr 2016/347-31). The results will be presented in scientific journals and scientific meetings during 2019-2022 and are planned to be used for the development of future care models. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03180606.

Indexed as

FrailtyHouse CallsPrimary Health CareSocial SupportAgedAged, 80 and overAmbulatory CareCost-Benefit AnalysisFemaleFrail ElderlyHealth Care CostsHealth PolicyHospitalizationHumansLength of StayMalecare frail elderly

Identifiers

PMID31122995
PMCPMC6538001
OpenAlexW2946783640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.