ArticleBMJ open2019
Risk stratification model for in-hospital death in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a nationwide retrospective cohort study in Japan.
Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Revisiting ischemic and bleeding events in high bleeding risk patients after PCI: insights from a Japanese nationwide registry.Cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics · 2026Observational
- The Japanese PCI Registry (J-PCI): 17 Years of Insights Into Quality, Outcomes, and Practice Evolution.JACC. Asia · 2026Article
- Development and validation of a predictive model for in-hospital mortality in patients with coronary heart disease and renal insufficiency.International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention · 2025Article
- Harnessing Artificial Intelligence for Innovation in Interventional Cardiovascular Care.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2025Review
- Contemporary Risk Models for In-Hospital and 30-Day Mortality After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.Current cardiology reports · 2024Review
- Changing Trends in Mechanical Circulatory Support Use and Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Interventions for Acute Coronary Syndrome Complicated With Cardiogenic Shock: Insights From a Nationwide Registry in Japan.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2023Article
- Forewarned Is Forearmed: Machine Learning Algorithms for the Prediction of Catheter-Induced Coronary and Aortic Injuries.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Patient Characteristics, Procedural Details, and Outcomes of Contemporary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Real-World Practice: Insights from Nationwide Thai PCI Registry.Journal of interventional cardiology · 2022Article
- Clinical outcomes for intracoronary imaging strategies at different medical facilities in Japanese patients with coronary artery disease: the SAKURA imaging PCI Registry.Heart and vessels · 2022Article
- In-hospital Bleeding Outcomes of Oral Anticoagulant and Dual Antiplatelet Therapy During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: An Analysis From the Japanese Nationwide Registry.Journal of cardiovascular pharmacology · 2021Article
- Article
- Contemporary use and trends in percutaneous coronary intervention in Japan: an outline of the J-PCI registry.Cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics · 2020Article
- Outcome of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Relation to the Institutional Volume of Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo provide an accurate adjustment for mortality in a benchmark, developing a risk prediction model from its own dataset is mandatory. We aimed to develop and validate a risk model predicting in-hospital mortality in a broad spectrum of Japanese patients after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
designA retrospective cohort study was conducted.
settingThe Japanese-PCI (J-PCI) registry includes a nationally representative retrospective sample of patients who underwent PCI and covers approximately 88% of all PCIs in Japan.
participantsOverall, 669 181 patients who underwent PCI between January 2014 and December 2016 in 1018 institutes.
main outcome measuresIn-hospital death.
resultsThe study population (n=669 181; mean (SD) age, 70.1(11.0) years; women, 24.0%) was divided into two groups: 50% of the sample was used for model derivation (n=334 591), while the remaining 50% was used for model validation (n=334 590). Using the derivation cohort, both 'full' and 'preprocedure' risk models were developed using logistic regression analysis. Using the validation cohort, the developed risk models were internally validated. The in-hospital mortality rate was 0.7%. The preprocedure model included age, sex, clinical presentation, previous PCI, previous coronary artery bypass grafting, hypertension, dyslipidaemia, smoking, renal dysfunction, dialysis, peripheral vascular disease, previous heart failure and cardiogenic shock. Angiographic information, such as the number of diseased vessel and location of the target lesion, was also included in the full model. Both models performed well in the entire validation cohort (C-indexes: 0.929 and 0.926 for full and preprocedure models, respectively) and among prespecified subgroups with good calibration, although both models underestimated the risk of mortality in high-risk patients with the elective procedure.
conclusionsThese simple models from a nationwide J-PCI registry, which is easily applicable in clinical practice and readily available directly at the patients' presentation, are valid tools for preprocedural risk stratification of patients undergoing PCI in contemporary Japanese practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.