Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31122946›Full record

ArticleHospital pediatrics2019

Pain Sensitization, Breastfeeding Effectiveness, and Parental Preferences by Antibiotic Route in Suspected Neonatal Sepsis.

Lina Patel, James A Lin, Rong Guo, Deepa Kulkarni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hospital pediatrics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lina PatelDepartment of Pediatrics, University of California, Los Angeles Mattel Children's Hospital, Los Angeles, California; and.
James A LinDepartment of Pediatrics, University of California, Los Angeles Mattel Children's Hospital, Los Angeles, California; and.
Rong GuoDivision of General Internal Medicine and Health Sciences Research, Department of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
Deepa KulkarniDepartment of Pediatrics, University of California, Los Angeles Mattel Children's Hospital, Los Angeles, California; and dkulkarni@mednet.ucla.edu.

Funding

UCLA Clinical Translational Science InstituteUL1TR001881 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI ARLEEN F. BROWN, ARASH NAEIM · 2016 to 2026
$118.1M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001881
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesIntravenous (IV) and intramuscular (IM) antibiotics have comparable efficacy in treating neonates undergoing sepsis evaluations. There are no clinical data favoring the use of either route regarding newborn pain and parental preferences. We hypothesized that pain associated with IM injections would worsen breastfeeding effectiveness and decrease parental satisfaction, making IV catheters the preferred route.

methodsThis prospective cohort study took place in an academic institution with nurseries in 2 separate hospitals, 1 providing IV antibiotics, and the other, IM antibiotics. Newborns receiving 48 hours of antibiotics were compared by using objective pain and breastfeeding scores and parental surveys.

resultsIn 185 newborns studied, pain scores on a 7-point scale were up to 3.4 points higher in the IM compared with the IV group (

conclusionsIM antibiotics in newborns are associated with pain sensitization and greater pain than IV dosing. Despite accurately recognizing newborn pain with the IM route, parents preferred this to the IV route, which was perceived to interfere with breastfeeding and bonding.

Indexed as

Procedural PainAdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsBreast FeedingConsumer BehaviorCritical PathwaysFemaleHumansInjections, IntramuscularInjections, IntravenousMaleNeonatal SepsisParentsAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID31122946
PMCPMC6537125

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.