Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31122944›Full record

ArticleJournal of epidemiology and community health2019

Neighbourhood disparities in the price of the cheapest cigarettes in the USA.

Sarah D Mills, Shelley D Golden, Lisa Henriksen, Amanda Y Kong, Tara L Queen, Kurt M Ribisl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of epidemiology and community health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Association between maternal e-cigarette use during pregnancy and low gestational weight gain.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sarah D MillsLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA sarahmills@unc.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-0183-6753
Shelley D GoldenLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Lisa HenriksenStanford Prevention Research Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
Amanda Y KongDepartment of Health Behavior, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Tara L QueenLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Kurt M RibislLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.

Funding

Maximizing state & local policies to restrict tobacco marketing at point of saleU01CA154281 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI HENRIKSEN, LISA ANNE, LUKE, DOUGLAS A · 2011 to 2015
$6.3M
POLICY STUDIES ON LIMITING TOBACCO MARKETING TO YOUTHR01CA067850 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI HENRIKSEN, LISA ANNE · 1997 to 2018
$5.3M
Cancer Control Education ProgramT32CA057726 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Melissa B Gilkey, Melissa A. Troester · 2017 to 2026
$3.7M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA067850NCI NIH HHS T32 CA057726NCI NIH HHS U01 CA154281
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is evidence that the cheapest cigarettes cost even less in neighbourhoods with higher proportions of youth, racial/ethnic minorities and low-income residents. This study examined the relationship between the price of the cheapest cigarette pack and neighbourhood demographics in a representative sample of tobacco retailers in the USA.

methodsData collectors recorded the price of the cheapest cigarette pack (regardless of brand) in 2069 retailers in 2015. Multilevel linear modelling examined the relationship between price and store neighbourhood (census tract) characteristics, specifically median household income and percentage of youth, Black, Asian/Pacific Islander and Hispanic residents.

resultsAverage price for the cheapest pack was $5.17 (SD=1.73) and it was discounted in 19.7% of stores. The price was $0.04 less for each SD increase in the percentage of youth and $0.22 less in neighbourhoods with the lowest as compared with the highest median household incomes. Excluding excise taxes, the average price was $2.48 (SD=0.85), and associations with neighbourhood demographics were similar.

conclusionThe cheapest cigarettes cost significantly less in neighbourhoods with a greater percentage of youth and lower median household income. Non-tax mechanisms to increase price, such as minimum price laws and restrictions on discounts/coupons, may increase cheap cigarette prices.

Indexed as

Poverty AreasCommerceEthnicityHumansLegislation as TopicMalePovertyResidence CharacteristicsTaxesTobacco ProductsYoung Adultneighbourhood/placepublic healthtobacco

Identifiers

PMID31122944
PMCPMC6689253

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.