Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31122840›Full record

ArticleEBioMedicine2019

Urinary TERT promoter mutations as non-invasive biomarkers for the comprehensive detection of urothelial cancer.

Patrice Hodonou Avogbe, Arnaud Manel, Emmanuel Vian, Geoffroy Durand, Nathalie Forey, Catherine Voegele, Maria Zvereva, Md Ismail Hosen, Sonia Meziani, Berengere De Tilly and 15 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EBioMedicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Patrice Hodonou AvogbeInternational Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), Lyon, France.
Arnaud ManelProtestant Clinic of Lyon, Urology department, Lyon, France.
Emmanuel VianProtestant Clinic of Lyon, Urology department, Lyon, France.
Geoffroy DurandInternational Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), Lyon, France.
Nathalie ForeyInternational Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), Lyon, France.
Catherine VoegeleInternational Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), Lyon, France.
Maria ZverevaInternational Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), Lyon, France; Faculty of Chemistry, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia.
Md Ismail HosenInternational Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), Lyon, France.
Sonia MezianiInternational Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), Lyon, France.
Berengere De TillyProtestant Clinic of Lyon, Urology department, Lyon, France.
Gilles PoloProtestant Clinic of Lyon, Urology department, Lyon, France.
Olesia LoleInternational Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), Lyon, France.
Pauline FrancoisInternational Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), Lyon, France.
Tiffany Myriam DelhommeInternational Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), Lyon, France.
Christine CarreiraInternational Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), Lyon, France.
Sara Monteiro-ReisPortuguese Oncology Institute of Porto, Research Center (CI-IPOP), Porto, Portugal.
Rui HenriquePortuguese Oncology Institute of Porto, Research Center (CI-IPOP), Porto, Portugal; Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPOP), Department of Pathology, Porto, Portugal; Institute of Biomedical Sciences Abel Salazar, University of Porto (ICBAS-UP), Porto, Portugal.
Behnoush Abedi-ArdekaniInternational Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), Lyon, France.
Graham ByrnesInternational Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), Lyon, France.
Matthieu FollInternational Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), Lyon, France.
Elisabete WeiderpassInternational Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), Lyon, France.
James McKayInternational Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), Lyon, France.
Carmen JeronimoPortuguese Oncology Institute of Porto, Research Center (CI-IPOP), Porto, Portugal; Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPOP), Department of Pathology, Porto, Portugal; Institute of Biomedical Sciences Abel Salazar, University of Porto (ICBAS-UP), Porto, Portugal.
Ghislaine SceloInternational Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), Lyon, France.
Florence Le Calvez-KelmInternational Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), Lyon, France. Electronic address: lecalvezf@iarc.fr.
Centre international de recherche sur le cancer · FRInfirmerie Protestante · FRUniversidade do Porto · PTInstituto Português de Oncologia Francisco Gentil · PTLomonosov Moscow State University · RU

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecurrent mutations in the promoter of the telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) gene (C228T and C250T) detected in tumours and cells shed into urine of urothelial cancer (UC) patients are putative biomarkers for UC detection and monitoring. However, the possibility of detecting these mutations in cell-free circulating DNA (cfDNA) in blood and urine, or DNA from urinary exfoliated cells (cellDNA) with a single-gene sensitive assay has never been tested in a case-control setting.

methodsWe developed a single-plex assay (UroMuTERT) for the detection of low-abundance TERT promoter mutations. We tested 93 primary and recurrent UC cases and 94 controls recruited in France (blood, urine samples and tumours for the cases), and 50 primary UC cases and 50 controls recruited in Portugal (urinary exfoliated cell samples). We compared our assay with urine cytology.

findingsIn the French series, C228T or C250T were detected in urinary cfDNA or cellDNA in 81 cases (87·1%; 95% CI 78·6-93·2), and five controls (Specificity 94·7%; 95%CI 88·0-98·3), with 98·6% (95% CI 92·5-99·96) concordance in matched tumours. Detection rate in plasma cfDNA among cases was 7·1%. The UroMuTERT sensitivity was (i) highest for urinary cfDNA and cellDNA combined, (ii) consistent across primary and recurrent cases, tumour stages and grades, (iii) higher for low-risk non-muscle invasive UC (86·1%) than urine cytology (23·0%) (P < 0·0001) and (iv) 93·9% when combined with cytology. In the Portuguese series - the sensitivity and specificity for detection of UC with urinary cellDNA was 68·0% (95% CI 53·3-80·5) and 98·0% (95% CI 89·3-100·0).

interpretationTERT promoter mutations detected by the UroMuTERT assay in urinary DNA (cfDNA or cellDNA) show excellent sensitivity and specificity for the detection of UC, significantly outperforming that of urine cytology notably for detection of low-grade early stages UC. FUND: French Cancer League; French Foster Research in Molecular Biology and European Commission FP7 Marie Curie COFUND.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorMutationPromoter Regions, GeneticAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAlgorithmsCase-Control StudiesCirculating Tumor DNADisease ManagementDNA Mutational AnalysisFemaleHumansLiquid BiopsyMaleMiddle AgedBiomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNATelomeraseTERT protein, humanBloodCell DNACell-free DNATERT mutationsUrineUrothelial cancer detection

Identifiers

PMID31122840
PMCPMC6603852
OpenAlexW2945030862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.