Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31122312›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS2019

Evaluation of a 16-week Change Cycle for Ventilated Mouse Cages.

Jack L Taylor, Penny Noel, Michael Mickelsen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Maintaining Welfare While Extending Cage-Change Intervals: A Performance-Based Study in IVC-Housed Mice.Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Evaluation and Refinement of a Spot-change-only Cage Management System for Mice.Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Assessing Accumulation of Organic Material on Rodent Cage Accessories.Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jack L TaylorOffice of Comparative Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah;, Email: jack@ocm.utah.edu.
Penny NoelOffice of Comparative Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Michael MickelsenOffice of Comparative Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The methods and conditions for housing research mice have been the subject of many discussions and publications in recent years. At our institution, we began to explore these matters with the goal of reducing stress in the animals and yet maintaining an environment that more closely resembled their habitat in the wild and yet was acceptable to researchers and the technicians that cared for the animals. Through a series of small inhouse studies, we derived a method that allowed the animals to stay in their established environment for longer than the standard 1- or 2-wk period. After several empirical studies, we concluded that the mice could stay in the same cage for 16 wk or perhaps even longer. To achieve this outcome, we perfected a method of removing 75% of the existing cage bedding and replacing it with clean bedding every 2 wk. To substantiate the validity of the method, we conducted a major study that evaluated the conditions of the cage, cage environment and the animals for a 16-wk period. In the study, we compared all of these factors in the 16-wk cages to a set of cages that were completely replaced on a 2-wk cycle. The mice in our study appeared to experience decreased stress, and observation also revealed that the 16-wk method was associated with increased pup survival in several colonies. The revised 16-wk method appears to create mouse cage conditions that are no different than the current standard (that is, every 1 or 2 wk) methods of cage changing.

Indexed as

Animal WelfareHousing, AnimalAnimal HusbandryAnimalsFemaleLaboratory Animal ScienceMiceVentilation

Identifiers

PMID31122312
PMCPMC6643086

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.