Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31122246›Full record

ArticleMicrobial cell factories2019

Exploring the xylose paradox in Saccharomyces cerevisiae through in vivo sugar signalomics of targeted deletants.

Karen O Osiro, Celina Borgström, Daniel P Brink, Birta Líf Fjölnisdóttir, Marie F Gorwa-Grauslund

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbial cell factories, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Advances inJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Re-evaluation of the impact ofMetabolic engineering communications · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Deletion ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  16. D-Xylose Sensing inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Improving Xylose Fermentation inMicroorganisms · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Karen O OsiroApplied Microbiology, Department of Chemistry, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Celina BorgströmApplied Microbiology, Department of Chemistry, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Daniel P BrinkApplied Microbiology, Department of Chemistry, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Birta Líf FjölnisdóttirApplied Microbiology, Department of Chemistry, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Marie F Gorwa-GrauslundApplied Microbiology, Department of Chemistry, Lund University, Lund, Sweden. marie-francoise.gorwa@tmb.lth.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4810-4082

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (BR) ScholarshipEnergimyndigheten 2018-004378Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences 2016-05297_VR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere have been many successful strategies to implement xylose metabolism in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, but no effort has so far enabled xylose utilization at rates comparable to that of glucose (the preferred sugar of this yeast). Many studies have pointed towards the engineered yeast not sensing that xylose is a fermentable carbon source despite growing and fermenting on it, which is paradoxical. We have previously used fluorescent biosensor strains to in vivo monitor the sugar signalome in yeast engineered with xylose reductase and xylitol dehydrogenase (XR/XDH) and have established that S. cerevisiae senses high concentrations of xylose with the same signal as low concentration of glucose, which may explain the poor utilization.

resultsIn the present study, we evaluated the effects of three deletions (ira2∆, isu1∆ and hog1∆) that have recently been shown to display epistatic effects on a xylose isomerase (XI) strain. Through aerobic and anaerobic characterization, we showed that the proposed effects in XI strains were for the most part also applicable in the XR/XDH background. The ira2∆isu1∆ double deletion led to strains with the highest specific xylose consumption- and ethanol production rates but also the lowest biomass titre. The signalling response revealed that ira2∆isu1∆ changed the low glucose-signal in the background strain to a simultaneous signalling of high and low glucose, suggesting that engineering of the signalome can improve xylose utilization.

conclusionsThe study was able to correlate the previously proposed beneficial effects of ira2∆, isu1∆ and hog1∆ on S. cerevisiae xylose uptake, with a change in the sugar signalome. This is in line with our previous hypothesis that the key to resolve the xylose paradox lies in the sugar sensing and signalling networks. These results indicate that the future engineering targets for improved xylose utilization should probably be sought not in the metabolic networks, but in the signalling ones.

Indexed as

GlucoseSaccharomyces cerevisiaeXyloseBiological TransportFermentationGene DeletionMetabolic Networks and PathwaysMitochondrial ProteinsPlasmidsSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSignal TransductionGlucoseMitochondrial ProteinsSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsXylosecAMP/PKAGFP biosensor∆hog1∆ira2∆isu1Saccharomyces cerevisiaeSNF1/Mig1pSnf3p/Rgt2pSugar sensing/signallingXylose

Identifiers

PMID31122246
PMCPMC6532234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.