Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31121845›Full record

ArticlePolymers2019

Polyhexamethylene Biguanide:Polyurethane Blend Nanofibrous Membranes for Wound Infection Control.

Anna Worsley, Kristin Vassileva, Janice Tsui, Wenhui Song, Liam Good

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. [Preparation of Lip-TTO-PHMB and evaluation of itsZhonghua shao shang yu chuang mian xiu fu za zhi · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Antifungal Polymeric Materials and Nanocomposites.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anna WorsleyRoyal Veterinary College, Department of Pathobiology and Population Sciences, 4 Royal College Street, London NW1 0TU, UK. aworsley@rvc.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-3298-0205
Kristin VassilevaRoyal Veterinary College, Department of Pathobiology and Population Sciences, 4 Royal College Street, London NW1 0TU, UK. Kristin.vassileva.16@ucl.ac.uk.
Janice TsuiUniversity College London, Centre for Biomaterials in Surgical Reconstruction and Regeneration, Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, 9th floor, Royal Free Hospital, Pond Street, London NW3 2QG, UK. janice.tsui@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-6826-4211
Wenhui SongUniversity College London, Centre for Biomaterials in Surgical Reconstruction and Regeneration, Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, 9th floor, Royal Free Hospital, Pond Street, London NW3 2QG, UK. w.song@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-8406-472X
Liam GoodRoyal Veterinary College, Department of Pathobiology and Population Sciences, 4 Royal College Street, London NW1 0TU, UK. lgood@rvc.ac.uk.
Royal Veterinary College · GBThe Royal Free Hospital · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council LIDo, award ref: 1764829
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Polyhexamethylene biguanide (PHMB) is a broad-spectrum antiseptic which avoids many efficacy and toxicity problems associated with antimicrobials, in particular, it has a low risk of loss of susceptibility due to acquired antimicrobial resistance. Despite such advantages, PHMB is not widely used in wound care, suggesting more research is required to take full advantage of PHMB's properties. We hypothesised that a nanofibre morphology would provide a gradual release of PHMB, prolonging the antimicrobial effects within the therapeutic window. PHMB:polyurethane (PU) electrospun nanofibre membranes were prepared with increasing PHMB concentrations, and the effects on antimicrobial activities, mechanical properties and host cell toxicity were compared. Overall, PHMB:PU membranes displayed a burst release of PHMB during the first hour following PBS immersion (50.5-95.9% of total released), followed by a gradual release over 120 h (≤25 wt % PHMB). The membranes were hydrophilic (83.7-53.3°), gradually gaining hydrophobicity as PHMB was released. They displayed superior antimicrobial activity, which extended past the initial release period, retained PU hyperelasticity regardless of PHMB concentration (collective tensile modulus of 5-35% PHMB:PU membranes, 3.56 ± 0.97 MPa; ultimate strain, >200%) and displayed minimal human cell toxicity (<25 wt % PHMB). With further development, PHMB:PU electrospun membranes may provide improved wound dressings.

Indexed as

antimicrobialantisepticelectrospinningnanofibresPHMBpolyhexamethylene biguanidepolyhexanidepolyurethanewound dressing

Identifiers

PMID31121845
PMCPMC6572704
OpenAlexW2944889428

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.