Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31121807›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2019

ECG Signal as Robust and Reliable Biometric Marker: Datasets and Algorithms Comparison.

Mariusz Pelc, Yuriy Khoma, Volodymyr Khoma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mariusz PelcFaculty of Electrical Engineering, Automatic Control and Informatics, Opole University of Technology, ul. Proszkowska 76, 45-758 Opole, Poland. m.pelc@gre.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-2818-1010
Yuriy KhomaDepartment of Information Measurement Technologies, Lviv Polytechnic National University, 79013 Lviv, Ukraine. yurii.v.khoma@lpnu.ua.ORCID 0000-0002-4677-5392
Volodymyr KhomaFaculty of Electrical Engineering, Automatic Control and Informatics, Opole University of Technology, ul. Proszkowska 76, 45-758 Opole, Poland. v.khoma@po.opole.pl.ORCID 0000-0001-9391-6525

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this paper, the possibility of using the ECG signal as an unequivocal biometric marker for authentication and identification purposes has been presented. Furthermore, since the ECG signal was acquired from 4 sources using different measurement equipment, electrodes positioning and number of patients as well as the duration of the ECG record acquisition, we have additionally provided an estimation of the extent of information available in the ECG record. To provide a more objective assessment of the credibility of the identification method, some selected machine learning algorithms were used in two combinations: with and without compression. The results that we have obtained confirm that the ECG signal can be acclaimed as a valid biometric marker that is very robust to hardware variations, noise and artifacts presence, that is stable over time and that is scalable across quite a solid (~100) number of users. Our experiments indicate that the most promising algorithms for ECG identification are LDA, KNN and MLP algorithms. Moreover, our results show that PCA compression, used as part of data preprocessing, does not only bring any noticeable benefits but in some cases might even reduce accuracy.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsElectrocardiographyBiomarkersDiscriminant AnalysisHumansLogistic ModelsPrincipal Component AnalysisSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedBiomarkersbiomarkerECGhuman identificationLviv Biometric Datasetmachine learningPhysionet

Identifiers

PMID31121807
PMCPMC6566823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.