Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31121600›Full record

ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2019

Real-World Evidence of Patient Outcome Following Treatment of Advanced Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor (GIST) with Imatinib, Sunitinib, and Sorafenib in Publicly Funded Health Care in Poland.

Melania Brzozowska, Waldemar Wierzba, Sylwia Szafraniec-Buryło, Marcin Czech, Joanna Połowinczak-Przybyłek, Piotr Potemski, Andrzej Śliwczyński

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Merkel Cell Carcinoma.Biomedicines · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Melania BrzozowskaDepartment of Drug Economics, National Health Fund, Central Office, Warsaw, Poland.
Waldemar WierzbaUHE Satellite Campus in Warsaw, University of Humanities and Economics in Łódź, Warsaw, Poland.
Sylwia Szafraniec-BuryłoDepartment of Pharmacoeconomics, Institute of Mother and Child, Warsaw, Poland.
Marcin CzechDepartment of Pharmacoeconomics, Institute of Mother and Child, Warsaw, Poland.
Joanna Połowinczak-PrzybyłekDepartment of Chemotherapy, Copernicus Memorial Hospital, Medical University of Łódź, Łódź, Poland.
Piotr PotemskiCopernicus Memorial Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center and Traumatology, Medical University of Łódź, Łódź, Poland.
Andrzej ŚliwczyńskiDivision of Quality Services, Procedures and Medical Standards, Medical University of Łódź, Łódź, Poland.
Copernicus Memorial Hospital · PLMedical University of Lodz · PLUniversity of Humanities and Economics in Lodz · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND This study aimed to undertake an analysis of ten years of real-world evidence (RWE) on overall survival (OS) following treatment of advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) with imatinib, sunitinib, and sorafenib using data from the Polish National Health Fund. MATERIAL AND METHODS Data from the Polish National Health Fund, the sole Polish public payer, identified 1,641 patients with advanced GIST who were treated with imatinib (n=1047), sunitinib (n=457), and sorafenib (n=137). The differences in overall survival (OS) were analyzed. RESULTS For patients with advanced GIST, the median follow-up time for patients treated with imatinib was 71 months (95% CI, 64.8-79.2), the median OS was 56.9 months (95% CI, 50.4-61.2), with survival at 12 months (89.5%), 24 months (77.9%), 36 months (66.9%), and 60 months (48.4%). The median follow-up time for patients treated with sunitinib was 41.4 months (95% CI, 34.6-49.3), the median OS was 22.8 months (95% CI, 19.2-26.8), with survival at 12 months (68.2%), 24 months (47.1%), and 36 months (31%). The median follow-up time for patients treated with sorafenib was 17.4 months (95% CI, 14.6-22.9), the median OS was 16.9 months (95% CI, 13.7-24.3), with survival at 12 months (61.9%), at 24 months (36.2%), and at 36 months (16.8%). CONCLUSIONS Real-world data collected in a ten-year period confirmed the effectiveness of the use of imatinib, sunitinib, or sorafenib for the treatment of advanced GIST and was comparable with the findings from clinical trials.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntineoplastic AgentsBenzamidesDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleGastrointestinal Stromal TumorsHumansImatinib MesylateIndolesMaleMiddle AgedPolandProtein Kinase InhibitorsPublic Health PracticePyrrolesAntineoplastic AgentsBenzamidesImatinib MesylateIndolesProtein Kinase InhibitorsPyrrolesSorafenibSunitinib

Identifiers

PMID31121600
PMCPMC6543874
OpenAlexW2945151127

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.