Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31121515›Full record

ArticleUltrasonics2019

Histological and blood chemistry examination of the rodent kidney after exposure to flash-replenishment ultrasound contrast imaging.

A Gloria Nyankima, Sandeep Kasoji, Rachel Cianciolo, Paul A Dayton, Emily H Chang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ultrasonics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

A Gloria NyankimaJoint Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill and North Carolina State University, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Sandeep KasojiJoint Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill and North Carolina State University, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Rachel CiancioloDepartment of Veterinary Biosciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Paul A DaytonJoint Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill and North Carolina State University, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Emily H ChangUNC Kidney Center and Division of Nephrology & Hypertension, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. Electronic address: emily_chang@med.unc.edu.

Funding

Virology Research Program (Program 4)P30CA016086 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Deborah F. Tate · 1985 to 2026
$201.5M
Re-Entry Supplement: Investigation of Oral Microbial Enzymes for the Detection and Treatment of Periodontal DiseaseUL1TR002489 · NCATS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BUSE, JOHN BERNARD, SHAHEEN, NICHOLAS J · 2018 to 2022
$48.6M
Enhancing High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound for Tumor Ablation with Phase-Changing NanoagentsF31CA206602 · NCI · NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY RALEIGH · PI NYANKIMA, ANGE GLORIA · 2016 to 2018
$112k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002489NCI NIH HHS F31 CA206602NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016086
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this work is to investigate whether imaging sequences of flash-replenishment contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) of the kidney result in chronic or acute bioeffects. Kidneys of female Fischer 344 rats were imaged using the flash-replenishment technique. Animals were separated into four groups (N = 31). Imaging was conducted with a 4C1 probe, driven by an Acuson Sequoia system with Definity microbubbles as the ultrasound contrast agent. During the flash phase of the imaging sequence, one kidney in each animal was exposed to either a mechanical index (MI) of 1.0 or 1.9. For each MI, half of the animals were sacrificed shortly after imaging (4 h) or after 2 weeks. A blinded veterinary nephropathologist reviewed the histopathology of both the imaged and control (non-imaged) kidney. Blood urea nitrogen (BUN) was measured for each animal prior to imaging and at the time of necropsy. Histopathology assessments in both the 1.0 and 1.9 MI groups revealed no signs of hemorrhage at either the 4-h or 2-week time point. BUN showed minor but statistically significant elevations in both the 1.0 and 1.9 MI groups, but no significant difference was present at the 2-week time point in the 1.0 MI group. All BUN levels (at both time points) remained in the normal range. In conclusion, CEUS with flash-replenishment imaging sequences did not result in kidney bioeffects observable with histology at early or late time points. Increases in BUN levels were observed after imaging, but were minimized when using a moderate MI (1.0).

Indexed as

Blood Chemical AnalysisUltrasonographyAnimalsBlood Urea NitrogenContrast MediaFemaleFluorocarbonsKidneyMicrobubblesRatsRats, Inbred F344Contrast MediaFluorocarbonsperflutrenBioeffectsContrast enhanced ultrasoundMicrobubbleUltrasound contrast agents

Identifiers

PMID31121515
PMCPMC6710155

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.