Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31121295›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2019

Neural specificity of scene representations is related to memory performance in childhood.

Yana Fandakova, Sarah Leckey, Charles C Driver, Silvia A Bunge, Simona Ghetti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Task-Switch Related Reductions in Neural Distinctiveness in Children and Adults: Commonalities and Differences.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Yana FandakovaCenter for Lifespan Psychology, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Lentzeallee 94, 14195, Berlin, Germany; Center for Mind and Brain, University of California, Davis, 267 Cousteau Place, Davis, CA 95616, USA; Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, 132 Barker Hall, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA. Electronic address: fandakova@mpib-berlin.mpg.de.
Sarah LeckeyCenter for Mind and Brain, University of California, Davis, 267 Cousteau Place, Davis, CA 95616, USA; Department of Psychology, University of California, Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Charles C DriverCenter for Lifespan Psychology, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Lentzeallee 94, 14195, Berlin, Germany.
Silvia A BungeHelen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, 132 Barker Hall, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA; Department of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, 3407 Tolman Hall, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.
Simona GhettiCenter for Mind and Brain, University of California, Davis, 267 Cousteau Place, Davis, CA 95616, USA; Department of Psychology, University of California, Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, USA. Electronic address: sghetti@ucdavis.edu.
University of California, Berkeley · USUniversity of California, Davis · USMax Planck Institute for Human Development · DE

Funding

Role of the Hippocampus and its Projections in Episodic Memory DevelopmentR01MH091109 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI BUNGE, SILVIA A., GHETTI, SIMONA · 2011 to 2015
$2.7M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH091109
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Successful memory encoding is supported by medial temporal, retrosplenial, and occipital regions, which show developmental differences in recruitment from childhood to adulthood. However, little is known about the extent to which neural specificity in these brain regions, or the distinctiveness with which sensory information is represented, continues to develop during middle childhood and how it contributes to memory performance. The present study used multivariate pattern analysis to examine the distinctiveness of different scene representations in 169 children and 31 adults, and its relation to memory performance. Most children provided data over up to three measurement occasions between 8 and 15 years (267 total scans), allowing us to examine changes in memory and neural specificity over time. Memory performance was lower in children than in adults, and increased in children over time. Different scenes presented during memory encoding could be reliably decoded from parahippocampal, lateral occipital, and retrosplenial regions in children and adults. Neural specificity in children was similar to adults, and did not change reliably over time. Among children, higher neural specificity in scene-processing regions was associated with better memory concurrently. These results suggest that the distinctiveness with which incoming information is represented is important for memory performance in childhood, but other processes operating on these representations support developmental improvements in memory performance over time.

Indexed as

Brain MappingMemory, EpisodicAdolescentAdolescent DevelopmentAdultCerebral CortexChildChild DevelopmentFemaleGyrus CinguliHippocampusHumansLongitudinal StudiesMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleOccipital LobeChild developmentfMRIHippocampusMemoryMVPAParahippocampalRepresentationRetroesplenialScene

Identifiers

PMID31121295
PMCPMC6824265
OpenAlexW2946105324

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.