Trial reportEuropean heart journal2019
Effects of alirocumab on types of myocardial infarction: insights from the ODYSSEY OUTCOMES trial.
Trial report in European heart journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 68 citations in OpenAlex.
- Alirocumab after acute coronary syndrome in patients with a history of heart failure.European heart journal · 2022 · on this mapTrial
- Risk factors for type 1 and type 2 myocardial infarction.European heart journal · 2022Trial
- Incidence, Trends, and Outcomes of Type 2 Myocardial Infarction in a Community Cohort.Circulation · 2020Trial
- The Effect of Restrictive vs Liberal Blood Transfusion Strategy on Subsequent Myocardial Infarction Type.JACC. Advances · 2026Article
- Impact of in-hospital ACEI use on long-term prognosis in discharged type 2 myocardial infarction patients: a retrospective propensity score-matched cohort study.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Observational
- Reducing the risk of heart attack: the key role of lipid profiling and atherosclerosis imaging.European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025Article
- Type 2 myocardial infarction: challenges in diagnosis and treatment.European heart journal · 2025Review
- Type 2 MI a legitimate efficacy endpoint in cardiovascular trials? A critical appraisal.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Safety of the PCSK9 inhibitor alirocumab: insights from 47 296 patient-years of observation.European heart journal. Cardiovascular pharmacotherapy · 2024Review
- Neutrophil lymphocyte ratio and heart type fatty acid binding protein as a prognostic marker in Myocardial infarction within 48 h of admission.The Egyptian heart journal : (EHJ) : official bulletin of the Egyptian Society of Cardiology · 2024Article
- PCSK9-antibodies fail to block PCSK9-induced inflammation in macrophages and cannot recapitulate protective effects of PCSK9-deficiency in experimental myocardial infarction.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Article
- Research trends in lipid-lowering therapies for coronary heart disease combined with hyperlipidemia: a bibliometric study and visual analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Article
- Article
- Management and outcome trends in type 2 myocardial infarction: an investigation from the SWEDEHEART registry.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Interaction of Cardiovascular Nonmodifiable Risk Factors, Comorbidities and Comedications With Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury and Cardioprotection by Pharmacological Treatments and Ischemic Conditioning.Pharmacological reviews · 2023Review
- In-hospital initiation of PCSK9 inhibitor and short-term lipid control in patients with acute myocardial infarction.Lipids in health and disease · 2022Observational
- Association of genetic polymorphisms of PCSK9 with type 2 diabetes in Uygur Chinese population.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2022Article
- Acute coronary syndromes.Lancet (London, England) · 2022Review
- Characteristics and Outcomes of Type 2 Myocardial Infarction.JAMA cardiology · 2022Article
- Type 2 MI and Myocardial Injury in the Era of High-sensitivity Troponin.European cardiology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
22 authors at 19 institutions in 10 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsThe third Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction (MI) Task Force classified MIs into five types: Type 1, spontaneous; Type 2, related to oxygen supply/demand imbalance; Type 3, fatal without ascertainment of cardiac biomarkers; Type 4, related to percutaneous coronary intervention; and Type 5, related to coronary artery bypass surgery. Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) reduction with statins and proprotein convertase subtilisin-kexin Type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors reduces risk of MI, but less is known about effects on types of MI. ODYSSEY OUTCOMES compared the PCSK9 inhibitor alirocumab with placebo in 18 924 patients with recent acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and elevated LDL-C (≥1.8 mmol/L) despite intensive statin therapy. In a pre-specified analysis, we assessed the effects of alirocumab on types of MI. METHODS AND
resultsMedian follow-up was 2.8 years. Myocardial infarction types were prospectively adjudicated and classified. Of 1860 total MIs, 1223 (65.8%) were adjudicated as Type 1, 386 (20.8%) as Type 2, and 244 (13.1%) as Type 4. Few events were Type 3 (n = 2) or Type 5 (n = 5). Alirocumab reduced first MIs [hazard ratio (HR) 0.85, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.77-0.95; P = 0.003], with reductions in both Type 1 (HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.77-0.99; P = 0.032) and Type 2 (0.77, 0.61-0.97; P = 0.025), but not Type 4 MI.
conclusionAfter ACS, alirocumab added to intensive statin therapy favourably impacted on Type 1 and 2 MIs. The data indicate for the first time that a lipid-lowering therapy can attenuate the risk of Type 2 MI. Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol reduction below levels achievable with statins is an effective preventive strategy for both MI types.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.