Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31120957›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2019

CD4+ T cell cytokine responses to the DAR-901 booster vaccine in BCG-primed adults: A randomized, placebo-controlled trial.

Tereza Masonou, David A Hokey, Timothy Lahey, Alice Halliday, Luis C Berrocal-Almanza, Wendy F Wieland-Alter, Robert D Arbeit, Ajit Lalvani, C Fordham von Reyn

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02063555 (A Phase 1, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind, Multiple-Dose, Dose-Ranging Study of the Safety and Immunogenicity of DAR-901, a Killed, Non-Tuberculous Mycobacterial Vaccine, in HIV-negative and HIV-positive Adults Who Have Previously Received BCG), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02063555 phase1completednot on this map

A Phase 1, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind, Multiple-Dose, Dose-Ranging Study of the Safety and Immunogenicity of DAR-901, a Killed, Non-Tuberculous Mycobacterial Vaccine, in HIV-negative and HIV-positive Adults Who Have Previously Received BCG

TypeinterventionalSponsorDartmouth-Hitchcock Medical CenterRan2014 to 2016Enrolled59ConditionsTuberculosisArmsDAR-901, BCG, Sterile saline
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. HowVaccines · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Host Immune Response toJournal of inflammation research · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. COVID-19 vaccine development: What lessons can we learn from TB?Annals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials · 2020
    Review
  14. Tuberculosis vaccine development: from classic to clinical candidates.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2020
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Tereza MasonouTuberculosis Research Centre, Respiratory Infections Section, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-3663-8965
David A HokeyAeras, Rockville, MD, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-6184-2485
Timothy LaheyLarner College of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-1081-9269
Alice HallidayTuberculosis Research Centre, Respiratory Infections Section, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Luis C Berrocal-AlmanzaTuberculosis Research Centre, Respiratory Infections Section, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1634-9971
Wendy F Wieland-AlterGeisel School of Medicine, Hanover, NH, United States of America.
Robert D ArbeitTufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, United States of America.
Ajit LalvaniTuberculosis Research Centre, Respiratory Infections Section, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
C Fordham von ReynGeisel School of Medicine, Hanover, NH, United States of America.
Imperial College London · GBDartmouth College · USAeras · USTufts University · USUniversity of Vermont · US

Funding

Department of Health 10064Department of Health 1215-20013
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDAR-901 is an inactivated whole cell tuberculosis booster vaccine, prepared using a new scalable, broth-grown method from the master cell bank of SRL172, a vaccine previously shown to prevent tuberculosis. This study examined whether DAR-901 (a) induces CD4+ T cell cytokine profiles previously proposed as correlates of protection and (b) has a specific vaccine-induced immunological signature compared to BCG or placebo.

methodsWe analysed CD4+ T cell cytokine immune responses from 10 DAR-901 recipients, 9 BCG recipients and 9 placebo recipients from the Phase I DAR-901 MDES trial. In that study, HIV-negative, IGRA-negative participants with prior BCG immunization were randomized (double-blind) to receive three intradermal injections of DAR-901 or saline placebo or two injections of saline placebo followed by an intradermal injection of BCG. Antigen-specific functional and phenotypic CD4+ T cell responses along with effector phenotype of responder cells were measured by intracellular cytokine staining.

resultsDAR-901 recipients exhibited increased DAR-901 antigen-specific polyfunctional or bifunctional T cell responses compared to baseline. Vaccine specific CD4+ IFNγ, IL2, TNFα and any cytokine responses peaked at 7 days post-dose 3. Th1 responses predominated, with most responder cells exhibiting a polyfunctional effector memory phenotype. BCG induced greater CD4+ T cell responses than placebo while the more modest DAR-901 responses did not differ from placebo. Neither DAR-901 nor BCG induced substantial or sustained Th17 /Th22 cytokine responses.

conclusionDAR-901, a TB booster vaccine grown from the master cell bank of SRL 172 which was shown to prevent TB, induced low magnitude polyfunctional effector memory CD4+ T cell responses. DAR-901 responses were lower than those induced by BCG, a vaccine that has been shown ineffective as a booster to prevent tuberculosis disease. These results suggest that induction of higher levels of CD4+ cytokine stimulation may not be a critical or pre-requisite characteristic for candidate TB vaccine boosters.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT02063555.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedBCG VaccineCD4-Positive T-LymphocytesCytokinesDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansImmunization, SecondaryMaleMiddle AgedMycobacterium tuberculosisTuberculosisTuberculosis VaccinesYoung AdultBCG VaccineCytokinesTuberculosis Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID31120957
PMCPMC6532882
OpenAlexW2946274634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.