ArticlePLoS genetics2019
De novo gene birth.
Article in PLoS genetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 186 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
186 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- DetectNAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2026Article
- The diverse functions of viral microproteins.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Emergence Biases in Molecular Evolution.Genome biology and evolution · 2026Review
- A Reassessment of Positive Growth Effects of Expressed Random Sequence Clones in E. coli Suggests Direct Adaptive Functions.Genome biology and evolution · 2026Article
- High-resolution global recombination mapping in C. elegans reveals sexual dimorphisms shaped by meiotic chromosomal features and structures.PLoS genetics · 2026Article
- High-resolution global recombination mapping inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Descent from a common ancestor restricts exploration of protein sequence space.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Imported, not invented, genes prevail amongProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- PyamilySeq: exposing the fragility of conventional gene (re)clustering and prokaryotic pangenomic inference methods.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Emergence and Tandem Repeat-Mediated Elongation of a Translated De Novo Open Reading Frame in Human Oncogenic RNA Gene VPS9D1-AS1 (MYU).Genome biology and evolution · 2026Article
- Systematic discovery of retina-enriched Rik genes identifies 1190005I06Rik as a novel modulator of visual signalling.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Article
- Origin of class B J-domain proteins involved in amyloid transactions.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Impact of GC content on de novo gene birth.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Discovering, Integrating, and Reinterpreting the Molecular Logic of Life: From Classical Theories of Heredity to an Extended Functional Perspective on the Central Dogma.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Evolutionary Balancing of Genetic Consequence and Innovation in Mammals Through Variable Number Tandem Repeats.Genome biology and evolution · 2026Review
- Comparative analysis of m6A mRNA modification inFrontiers in genetics · 2026Article
- Diversify and conquer: How effector diversity is shaped by host-microbe co-evolution.PLoS pathogens · 2026Article
- Machine learning can distinguish orphans that have resulted from sequence divergence beyond recognition.Bioinformatics advances · 2026Article
- MaizeGDB Phylostrata Tool: exploring evolutionary origins of maize proteins.Bioinformatics advances · 2026Article
126 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.