Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31120890›Full record

Observational studyPloS one2019

Oral anticoagulation in very elderly patients with atrial fibrillation: Results from the prospective multicenter START2-REGISTER study.

Daniela Poli, Emilia Antonucci, Walter Ageno, Lorenza Bertù, Ludovica Migliaccio, Lucia Martinese, Giuseppe Pilato, Sophie Testa, Gualtiero Palareti

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Daniela PoliCenter for Atherothrombotic Diseases, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Firenze, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5166-6596
Emilia AntonucciArianna Anticoagulazione Foundation, Bologna, Italy.
Walter AgenoDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy.
Lorenza BertùDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy.
Ludovica MigliaccioArianna Anticoagulazione Foundation, Bologna, Italy.
Lucia MartineseDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Firenze, Italy.
Giuseppe PilatoDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Firenze, Italy.
Sophie TestaHaemostasis and Thrombosis Centre, Hospital of Cremona, Cremona, Italy.
Gualtiero PalaretiArianna Anticoagulazione Foundation, Bologna, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have shown similar efficacy and safety with respect to warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the proportion of patients aged ≥85 years enrolled in clinical trials was low and the applicability of their results to very elderly patients is still uncertain. We have carried out a prospective cohort study on AF patients aged ≥85 years enrolled in the Survey on anticoagulaTed pAtients RegisTer (START2-Register) and treated with either VKAs or DOACs, with the aim to evaluate mortality, bleeding and thrombotic rates during a long-term follow-up. We enrolled 1124 patients who started anticoagulation at ≥85 years with VKA (58.7%) or DOACs (41.3%), Clinical characteristics of patients were similar, except for a higher prevalence of coronary artery disease and renal failure in VKAs patients and of a history of previous bleeding and previous stroke/TIA in patients on DOACs. Median CHA2DS2VASc and HAS-BLED scores were similar between the two groups. During follow-up, 47 major bleedings (rate 2.3 x100 pt-yrs) and 19 stroke/TIA (0.9 x100 pt-yrs) were recorded. The incidence of bleeding was similar between patients on VKAs and DOACs. Patients on DOACs showed a higher rate of thrombotic events during treatment (rate 1.84 and 0.50,respectively). Mortality rate was higher in patients on VKAs than in patients on DOACs (HR 0.64 (95% CI 0.46-0.91). In conclusion, we confirm the overall safety and effectiveness of anticoagulant treatment in very elderly AF patients, with lower mortality rates in DOACs patients, similar bleeding risk, and a higher risk for cerebral thrombotic events in DOACs patients.

Indexed as

Atrial FibrillationFollow-Up StudiesHemorrhageRegistriesStrokeWarfarinAdministration, OralAged, 80 and overAnticoagulantsFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleProspective StudiesRisk FactorsAnticoagulantsWarfarin

Identifiers

PMID31120890
PMCPMC6532867

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.