Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31120533›Full record

Trial reportJAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery2019

Effect of Tinnitus Retraining Therapy vs Standard of Care on Tinnitus-Related Quality of Life: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Tinnitus Retraining Therapy Trial Research Group, Roberta W Scherer, Craig Formby

3 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 45 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01177137 phase3completednot on this map

Tinnitus Retraining Therapy Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public HealthRan2011 to 2017Enrolled151ConditionsSubjective TinnitusArmsConventional sound generator (SG), Placebo sound generator (placebo SG), Standard of Care (SC), Directive Counseling (DC)
NCT05811871 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Examining Variables Affecting Patient Participation in Clinical Trials for Tinnitus

TypeobservationalSponsorPower Life Sciences Inc.Ran2024 to 2026Enrolled500ConditionsTinnitus
NCT07298499 naenrolling by invitationnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Post-Market Clinical Follow-Up of Hearing Aids and Tinnitus Masker Technology

TypeinterventionalSponsorStarkey Laboratories, IncRan2025 to 2027Enrolled100ConditionsHearing Aid, TinnitusArmsHearing Aid, Tinnitus Masker
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 90 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Effectiveness of tinnitus retraining therapy in alleviating tinnitus symptoms: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Acta otorhinolaryngologica Italica : organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di otorinolaringologia e chirurgia cervico-facciale · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Efficacy of tailor-made notched music training (TMNMT) in the treatment of tinnitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2024
    Pooled it
  4. Guideline
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Results of a 6-Month Field Trial of a Transitional Intervention for Debilitating Hyperacusis.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2024
    Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. [Characteristics of the Hearing Curves in 672 Tinnitus Patients and Their Relationship With Tinnitus Treatment Outcomes].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tinnitus Retraining Therapy Trial Research Group
Roberta W SchererCenter for Clinical Trials and Evidence Synthesis, Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
Craig FormbyDepartment of Communicative Disorders, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa.
Johns Hopkins University · USUniversity of Alabama · US

Funding

Tinnitus Retraining Therapy Trial (TRTT)U01DC007411 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA IN TUSCALOOSA · PI FORMBY, CHARLES CRAIG · 2009 to 2017
$3.7M
Tinnitus Retraining Therapy TrialU01DC007422 · NIDCD · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI SCHERER, ROBERTA W · 2009 to 2017
$2.6M
NIDCD NIH HHS U01 DC007411NIDCD NIH HHS U01 DC007422
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Tinnitus retraining therapy (TRT) is an internationally recognized, but controversial, protocol of uncertain efficacy that uses tinnitus-specific educational counseling (TC) and sound therapy (ST) to reduce the patient's tinnitus-evoked negative reaction to, and awareness of, tinnitus. Objective: To compare the efficacy of TRT and its components, ST and TC, with the standard of care (SoC) in reducing the negative effect of tinnitus on quality of life. Design, Setting, and Participants: A randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter phase 3 trial was conducted from August 4, 2011, to June 20, 2017, at 6 US military hospitals, the study chairs' office, and a data coordinating center, among 151 active-duty and retired military personnel and dependents with functionally adequate hearing sensitivity and moderate to severe subjective tinnitus. All analyses were based on intention to treat. Interventions: Central randomized allocation to TRT (TC and ST with conventional sound generators), partial TRT (TC with placebo sound generators), or SoC. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was mean change on the Tinnitus Questionnaire (TQ), assessed longitudinally between baseline and 18 months after start of therapy. The secondary outcomes were changes in TQ subscales, Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI), and Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI) total and subscales, as well as a 10-point visual analog scale (VAS). Results: Among the 151 participants in the study (44 women and 107 men; mean [SD] age, 50.6 [11.3] years), 51 were randomized to receive TRT, 51 to receive partial TRT, and 49 to receive standard of care. Longitudinal analyses showed no difference between partial TRT or TRT compared with SoC, or partial TRT compared with TRT, on TQ, TFI, or THI total scores. Comparison of changes in mean score from baseline to the 18-month visit also showed no difference between treatment groups. Significant improvement was observed at 18 months in all treatment groups on TQ scores for TRT (effect size, -1.32; 95% CI, -1.78 to -0.85), partial TRT (effect size, -1.16; 95% CI, -1.56 to -0.76), and SoC (effect size, -1.01; 95% CI, -1.41 to -0.61). Compared with baseline scores, at 18 months there were reductions in scores by 7 points or more on the TQ score for 86 of 111 participants (77.55%; 95% CI, 69.7%-85.2%), 13 points or more on the TFI for 52 of 111 participants (46.8%; 95% CI, 37.6%-56.1%), 7 points or more on the THI for 63 of 111 participants (56.8%; 95% CI, 47.5%-66.0%), and 2 points or more on the VAS for 45 of 93 participants (48.4%; 95% CI, 38.2%-58.5%). Conclusions and Relevance: There were few differences between treatment groups. About half of participants showed clinically meaningful reductions in the effect of tinnitus. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01177137.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeSoundAcoustic StimulationAwarenessClinical ProtocolsCounselingFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMilitary HealthPatient Education as TopicStandard of CareSurveys and QuestionnairesTinnitusTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID31120533
PMCPMC6547112
OpenAlexW2946513301

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.