Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31120416›Full record

ArticleeLife2019

Complementary congruent and opposite neurons achieve concurrent multisensory integration and segregation.

Wen-Hao Zhang, He Wang, Aihua Chen, Yong Gu, Tai Sing Lee, Ky Michael Wong, Si Wu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Causal inference during closed-loop navigation: parsing of self- and object-motion.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Causal inference and the evolution of opposite neurons.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Wen-Hao ZhangDepartment of Physics, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong.ORCID 0000-0001-7641-5024
He WangDepartment of Physics, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong.ORCID 0000-0003-2101-8683
Aihua ChenKey Laboratory of Brain Functional Genomics, Primate Research Center, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China.
Yong GuInstitute of Neuroscience, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4437-8956
Tai Sing LeeCenter of the Neural Basis of Cognition, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, United States.
Ky Michael WongDepartment of Physics, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong.ORCID 0000-0002-3078-4577
Si WuSchool of Electronics Engineering and Computer Science, IDG/McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology · HKCenter for the Neural Basis of Cognition · USChinese Academy of Sciences · CNEast China Normal University · CNPeking University · CN

Funding

Intelligence Advanced Research Projects Activity D16PC00007National Basic Research Program of China 2014CB846101National Science Foundation 1816568National Science Foundation CISE1320651Natural Science Foundation of China 31261160495Research Grants Council of Hong Kong 16306817Research Grants Council of Hong Kong 16322616Research Grants Council of Hong Kong 605813Research Grants Council of Hong Kong N HKUST606/12Research Grants Council, University Grants Committee 16306817Research Grants Council, University Grants Committee 16322616Research Grants Council, University Grants Committee 605813Research Grants Council, University Grants Committee N_HKUST606/12
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our brain perceives the world by exploiting multisensory cues to extract information about various aspects of external stimuli. The sensory cues from the same stimulus should be integrated to improve perception, and otherwise segregated to distinguish different stimuli. In reality, however, the brain faces the challenge of recognizing stimuli without knowing in advance the sources of sensory cues. To address this challenge, we propose that the brain conducts integration and segregation concurrently with complementary neurons. Studying the inference of heading-direction via visual and vestibular cues, we develop a network model with two reciprocally connected modules modeling interacting visual-vestibular areas. In each module, there are two groups of neurons whose tunings under each sensory cue are either congruent or opposite. We show that congruent neurons implement integration, while opposite neurons compute cue disparity information for segregation, and the interplay between two groups of neurons achieves efficient multisensory information processing.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrainHead MovementsHumansMacaca mulattaMotion PerceptionNeuronsPhotic StimulationTemporal LobeVestibule, LabyrinthVisual PerceptionBayesian inferenceconcurrent integration and segregationcontinuous attractor neural networkdecentralized architecturemultisensory integrationneurosciencenoneopposite neuron

Identifiers

PMID31120416
PMCPMC6565362
OpenAlexW2946207583

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.