Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31120104›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of epidemiology2020

Data Resource Profile: National Cancer Registration Dataset in England.

Katherine E Henson, Lucy Elliss-Brookes, Victoria H Coupland, Elsita Payne, Sally Vernon, Brian Rous, Jem Rashbass

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of epidemiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 184 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
184citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

184 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Flexible Survival Extrapolation with Blended Hazards: Accounting for Treatment Effect Waning in Health Technology Assessment.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Prediagnostic prescription patterns in pancreatic cancer: a retrospective primary care cohort study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2026
    Article
  20. Article

124 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Katherine E HensonNational Disease Registration, National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service, Public Health England, London, UK.
Lucy Elliss-BrookesNational Disease Registration, National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service, Public Health England, London, UK.
Victoria H CouplandNational Disease Registration, National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service, Public Health England, London, UK.
Elsita PayneNational Disease Registration, National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service, Public Health England, London, UK.
Sally VernonNational Disease Registration, National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service, Public Health England, London, UK.
Brian RousNational Disease Registration, National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service, Public Health England, London, UK.
Jem RashbassNational Disease Registration, National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service, Public Health England, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Datasets as TopicNeoplasmsRegistriesData CollectionEnglandHumans

Identifiers

PMID31120104
PMCPMC7124503

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.