Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31120007›Full record

ReviewPublic health nutrition2019

Australia's sugar tale.

Adyya Gupta, Caroline Miller, Jane Harford, Lisa G Smithers, Annette Braunack-Mayer

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Public health nutrition, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Estimating the potential impact of the Australian government's reformulation targets on household sugar purchases.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Adyya GuptaSchool of Health and Society, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia.
Caroline MillerHealth Policy Centre, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Jane HarfordAustralian Research Centre for Population Oral Health, The University of Adelaide,Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Lisa G SmithersSchool of Public Health, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Annette Braunack-MayerSchool of Health and Society, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia.
University of Adelaide · AUSouth Australian Health and Medical Research Institute · AUUniversity of Wollongong · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo establish high intake of free sugars and its related disease burden as a significant public health challenge in Australia.

designWe discuss five key actions to reduce intake of free sugars tailored to the Australian context. These strategies are informed by reviewing the global scientific evidence on the effectiveness of a range of policy responses to reduce intake of free sugars at the population level.

settingAustralia.

participantsAustralian population.

resultsThe five key actions to reduce population levels for intake of free sugars tailored to the Australian context include prioritising health in trade agreements and policy; introducing a fiscal policy supporting health and promoting food reformulation; regulating advertising and improving labelling; strengthening the current dietary guidelines; and encouraging healthy choices.

conclusionsThe adoption and implementation of the strategies discussed in the current commentary would aid in tackling the rising health burden from the intake of free sugars in Australia.

Indexed as

DietNutrition PolicyAustraliaEnergy IntakeFood LabelingHumansPublic HealthSugarsSugarsAustraliaFree sugarsPolicyStrategies

Identifiers

PMID31120007
PMCPMC10277187
OpenAlexW2945131193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.