ArticleJournal of biomedical optics2019
Reducing image artifact in diffuse optical tomography by iterative perturbation correction based on multiwavelength measurements.
Article in Journal of biomedical optics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Difference imaging from single measurements in diffuse optical tomography: a deep learning approach.Journal of biomedical optics · 2022Article
- Objective Numerical Evaluation of Diffuse, Optically Reconstructed Images Using Structural Similarity Index.Biosensors · 2021Article
- Ultrasound segmentation-guided edge artifact reduction in diffuse optical tomography using connected component analysis.Biomedical optics express · 2021Article
- Effect and correction of optode coupling errors in breast imaging using diffuse optical tomography.Biomedical optics express · 2021Article
- A Data Self-Calibration Method Based on High-Density Parallel Plate Diffuse Optical Tomography for Breast Cancer Imaging.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Article
- Image reconstruction for novel time domain near infrared optical tomography: towards clinical applications.Biomedical optics express · 2020Article
- Optimal breast cancer diagnostic strategy using combined ultrasound and diffuse optical tomography.Biomedical optics express · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ultrasound (US) guided diffuse optical tomography has demonstrated great potential for breast cancer diagnosis, treatment monitoring, and chemotherapy response prediction. Optical measurements of four different wavelengths are used to reconstruct unknown optical absorption maps, which are then used to calculate the hemoglobin concentration distribution of the US visible lesion. Reconstructed absorption maps are prone to image artifacts from outliers in measurement data from tissue heterogeneity, bad coupling between tissue and light guides, and motion by patient or operator. We propose an automated iterative perturbation correction algorithm to reduce image artifacts based on the structural similarity index (SSIM) of absorption maps of four optical wavelengths. The initial image is estimated from the truncated pseudoinverse solution. The SSIM was calculated for each wavelength to assess its similarity with other wavelengths. An absorption map is repeatedly reconstructed and projected back into measurement space to quantify projection error. Outlier measurements with highest projection errors are iteratively removed until all wavelength images are structurally similar with SSIM values greater than a threshold. Clinical data demonstrate statistically significant improvement in image artifact reduction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.