Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31119751›Full record

ArticleClinical cardiology2019

Hyperuricemia treatment in acute heart failure patients does not improve their long-term prognosis: A propensity score matched analysis from the AHEAD registry.

Marie Pavlusova, Jiri Jarkovsky, Klara Benesova, Jiri Vitovec, Ales Linhart, Petr Widimsky, Lenka Spinarova, Kamil Zeman, Jan Belohlavek, Filip Malek and 26 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cardiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

36 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

Marie PavlusovaDepartment of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic.
Jiri JarkovskyInstitute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
Klara BenesovaInstitute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
Jiri VitovecFaculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
Ales LinhartSecond Department of Internal Medicine, Department of Cardiology and Angiology, First Faculty of Medicine of the Charles University, Prague, and General University Hospital in Prague, Czech Republic.
Petr WidimskyUniversity Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady and the Third Faculty of Medicine of the Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Lenka SpinarovaFaculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
Kamil ZemanDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hospital Frydek-Mistek, Frydek-Mistek, Czech Republic.
Jan BelohlavekSecond Department of Internal Medicine, Department of Cardiology and Angiology, First Faculty of Medicine of the Charles University, Prague, and General University Hospital in Prague, Czech Republic.
Filip MalekDepartment of Cardiology, Hospital Na Homolce, Prague, Czech Republic.
Marian FelsociDepartment of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic.
Jiri KettnerDepartment of Cardiology, Institute of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic.
Petr OstadalDepartment of Cardiology, Hospital Na Homolce, Prague, Czech Republic.
Cestmir CihalikDepartment of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Jiri SpacFaculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
Hikmet Al-HitiDepartment of Cardiology, Institute of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic.
Marian FedorcoDepartment of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Richard FojtUniversity Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady and the Third Faculty of Medicine of the Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Andreas KrugerDepartment of Cardiology, Hospital Na Homolce, Prague, Czech Republic.
Josef MalekDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hospital Havlickuv Brod, Havlickuv Brod, Czech Republic.
Tereza MikusovaFirst Department of Internal Medicine, Cardiology and Angiology, St Anne's University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic.
Zdenek MonhartDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hospital Znojmo, Znojmo, Czech Republic.
Stanislava BohacovaDepartment of Cardiology, Tomas Bata Regional Hospital, Zlin, Czech Republic.
Lidka PohludkovaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hospital Frydek-Mistek, Frydek-Mistek, Czech Republic.
Filip RohacUniversity Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady and the Third Faculty of Medicine of the Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Jan VaclavikDepartment of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Dagmar VondrakovaDepartment of Cardiology, Hospital Na Homolce, Prague, Czech Republic.
Klaudia VyskocilovaFirst Department of Internal Medicine, Cardiology and Angiology, St Anne's University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic.
Miroslav BambuchDepartment of Cardiology, Tomas Bata Regional Hospital, Zlin, Czech Republic.
Gabriela DostalovaSecond Department of Internal Medicine, Department of Cardiology and Angiology, First Faculty of Medicine of the Charles University, Prague, and General University Hospital in Prague, Czech Republic.
Stepan HavranekSecond Department of Internal Medicine, Department of Cardiology and Angiology, First Faculty of Medicine of the Charles University, Prague, and General University Hospital in Prague, Czech Republic.
Ivana SvobodováInstitute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
Ladislav DusekInstitute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
Jindrich SpinarDepartment of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic.
Roman MiklikDepartment of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6873-0729
Jiri ParenicaDepartment of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic.
Masaryk University · CZCharles University · CZNa Homolce Hospital · CZUniversity Hospital Brno · CZUniversity Hospital Olomouc · CZHutní Projekt Frýdek-Místek (Czechia) · CZInstitute of Clinical and Experimental Medicine · CZTomas Bata University in Zlín · CZHavlíčkův Brod Hospital · CZNemocnice Znojmo · CZ

Funding

Masaryk University, Brno MUNI/A/1250/2017Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic 65269705
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHyperuricemia is associated with a poorer prognosis in heart failure (HF) patients. Benefits of hyperuricemia treatment with allopurinol have not yet been confirmed in clinical practice. The aim of our work was to assess the benefit of allopurinol treatment in a large cohort of HF patients.

methodsThe prospective acute heart failure registry (AHEAD) was used to select 3160 hospitalized patients with a known level of uric acid (UA) who were discharged in a stable condition. Hyperuricemia was defined as UA ≥500 μmoL/L and/or allopurinol treatment at admission. The patients were classified into three groups: without hyperuricemia, with treated hyperuricemia, and with untreated hyperuricemia at discharge. Two- and five-year all-cause mortality were defined as endpoints. Patients without hyperuricemia, unlike those with hyperuricemia, had a higher left ventricular ejection fraction, a better renal function, and higher hemoglobin levels, had less frequently diabetes mellitus and atrial fibrillation, and showed better tolerance to treatment with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers and/or beta-blockers.

resultsIn a primary analysis, the patients without hyperuricemia had the highest survival rate. After using the propensity score to set up comparable groups, the patients without hyperuricemia had a similar 5-year survival rate as those with untreated hyperuricemia (42.0% vs 39.7%, P = 0.362) whereas those with treated hyperuricemia had a poorer prognosis (32.4% survival rate, P = 0.006 vs non-hyperuricemia group and P = 0.073 vs untreated group).

conclusionHyperuricemia was associated with an unfavorable cardiovascular risk profile in HF patients. Treatment with low doses of allopurinol did not improve the prognosis of HF patients.

Indexed as

Propensity ScoreRegistriesAcute DiseaseAgedAged, 80 and overAllopurinolBiomarkersCause of DeathCzech RepublicDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGout SuppressantsHeart FailureHumansHyperuricemiaAllopurinolBiomarkersGout SuppressantsUric Acidacute heart failureAHEADallopurinol

Identifiers

PMID31119751
PMCPMC6671780
OpenAlexW2945137134

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.