Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31119578›Full record

Observational studyEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2019

White blood cell count and eosinopenia as valuable tools for the diagnosis of bacterial infections in the ED.

Charles-Eric Lavoignet, Pierrick Le Borgne, Sylvie Chabrier, Joffrey Bidoire, Hakim Slimani, Julia Chevrolet-Lavoignet, François Lefebvre, Rania Jebri, Luc Sengler, Pascal Bilbault and 1 more

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
9.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. The role of eosinophils in sepsis and acute respiratory distress syndrome: a scoping review.Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2021
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Charles-Eric LavoignetEmergency Department, Nord Franche-Comté Hospital, Trevenans, France.
Pierrick Le BorgneEmergency Department, Hautepierre Hospital, University Hospital of Strasbourg, 1 Avenue Molière, 67200, Strasbourg, France. pierrick_med@yahoo.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9141-6439
Sylvie ChabrierEmergency Department, Hautepierre Hospital, University Hospital of Strasbourg, 1 Avenue Molière, 67200, Strasbourg, France.
Joffrey BidoireEmergency Department, Nord Franche-Comté Hospital, Trevenans, France.
Hakim SlimaniEmergency Department, Nord Franche-Comté Hospital, Trevenans, France.
Julia Chevrolet-LavoignetPediatrics Department, Mulhouse Hospital, Mulhouse, France.
François LefebvreDepartment of Public Health, University Hospital of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Rania JebriEmergency Department, Erasme Hospital, Anderlecht, Belgium.
Luc SenglerEmergency Department, Nord Franche-Comté Hospital, Trevenans, France.
Pascal BilbaultEmergency Department, Hautepierre Hospital, University Hospital of Strasbourg, 1 Avenue Molière, 67200, Strasbourg, France.
and the CREMS network
Hôpital d'Hautepierre · FRInserm · FRCentre Hospitalier de Mulhouse · FRErasmus Hospital · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identifying an infection may be difficult in the ED. Neutrophilic leukocytosis is often used in the diagnosis of infection despite its lack of specificity in situations of stress. Our objective was to study the value of each parameter of the WBC count, in particular eosinopenia, to diagnose bacterial infections in the ED. We conducted a retrospective and observational study over a period of 6 months. All patients with one of the following diagnoses were eligible: pneumonia (9.9%), pyelonephritis (26.2%), prostatitis (8.4%), appendicitis (26.2%), cholecystitis (8.4%), and diverticular sigmoiditis (5%). A total of 466 infected patients were included for statistical analysis, and a control group of 466 uninfected patients was randomly selected in the same period of time. All leukocyte count parameters were significantly modified (p < 0.001) in the infected group compared with the control group. Neutrophils and total leukocytes remain the two most suitable parameters for the diagnosis of infections in the ED. Eosinopenia represented the most efficient parameter of the WBC count for the diagnosis of urinary and biliary tract infections. Deep eosinopenia presented a specificity of 94% for the diagnosis of infection. Any modification of the WBC count associated with an elevation of CRP (> 40 mg/L) or fever (> 38.5 °C) showed a high specificity for the diagnosis of infection. A careful analysis of the WBC count remains a valuable tool for the diagnosis of infection in the ED.

Indexed as

Emergency Service, HospitalLeukocyte CountAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBacterial InfectionsBiliary Tract DiseasesC-Reactive ProteinEosinophilsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificitySepsisC-Reactive ProteinEosinopeniaInfectionSepsisWhite blood cells

Identifiers

PMID31119578
OpenAlexW2946374583

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.