Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31119480›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2019

Multisession radiosurgery for perioptic meningiomas: medium-to-long term results from a CyberKnife cooperative study.

Marcello Marchetti, Alfredo Conti, Giancarlo Beltramo, Valentina Pinzi, Antonio Pontoriero, Irene Tramacere, Carolin Senger, Stefano Pergolizzi, Laura Fariselli

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Skull Base Meningiomas.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Marcello MarchettiRadiotherapy Unit, Dept. of Neurosurgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico C. Besta, Via Celoria 11, 20133, Milan, Italy. marcello.marchetti@istituto-besta.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2257-2184
Alfredo ContiDept. of Neurosurgery, University of Messina, AOU "Policlinico G. Martino", Messina, Italy.
Giancarlo BeltramoCyberKnife Center, Centro Diagnostico Italiano, Milan, Italy.
Valentina PinziRadiotherapy Unit, Dept. of Neurosurgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico C. Besta, Via Celoria 11, 20133, Milan, Italy.
Antonio PontorieroDept. of Radiation Oncology, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.
Irene TramacereDept of Research and Clinical Development, Scientific Directorate, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico C. Besta, Milan, Italy.
Carolin SengerDept. of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitaetmedizin, Berlin, Germany.
Stefano PergolizziDept. of Radiation Oncology, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.
Laura FariselliRadiotherapy Unit, Dept. of Neurosurgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico C. Besta, Via Celoria 11, 20133, Milan, Italy.

Funding

Accuray Europe N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMost recent literature has confirmed the efficacy of single-session radiosurgery (sRS) in the treatment of intracranial meningioma. Unfortunately, sRS is not always applicable due to large tumor volume and the proximity of the tumor to critical structures. When sRS is not recommended, multi-session radiosurgery (mRS) can be the solution. The best treatment schedule for mRS, however, is not well established. The aim of the present retrospective study is to validate the effectiveness of one approach, 25 Gy delivered in 5 fractions in 5 consecutive days, to treat skull base meningiomas.

methodsThis is a retrospective multicenter study. Patients with an anterior or a medium skull base meningioma that could not be treated by sRS due to large volume or proximity to the anterior optic pathways (AOPs) underwent 5-fraction mRS. Only patients with at least 36 months follow-up were included in the analysis. Local control and visual outcomes were investigated.

resultsOne-hundred-sixty-seven patients were included in the analysis. One-hundred-one patients underwent RS as a primary indication and 66 were treated after a previous surgery. The median follow-up period was 51 months (range 36-129 months). Progression-free survival at 3, 5 and 8 years were, respectively, 98%, 94% and 90%. Excluding the progressive disease patients, the visual worsening rate was 3.7%. The 42% of the patients with a pre-treatment visual deficit experienced improvement in vision.

conclusion25 Gy delivered in 5 fractions is an effective modality for meningiomas that are near the AOP or are too large to be treated by sRS. The treatment schedule controlled the tumors while sparing visual function.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMeningeal NeoplasmsMeningiomaMiddle AgedRadiosurgeryRetrospective StudiesSurvival RateTreatment OutcomeTumor BurdenMeningiomasMultisession radiosurgeryOptic pathwaysPeriopticRadiosurgery

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.