Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31119460›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2020

Prognostic accuracy of the sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) and quick SOFA for mortality in cancer patients with sepsis defined by systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS).

Bo-Ra Chae, Youn-Jung Kim, Yoon-Seon Lee

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Bo-Ra ChaeDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88 Olympic-ro 43 gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, South Korea.
Youn-Jung KimDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88 Olympic-ro 43 gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, South Korea.
Yoon-Seon LeeDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88 Olympic-ro 43 gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, South Korea. ysdoc@amc.seoul.kr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9555-8012

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe aimed to assess the prognostic accuracy of SOFA and qSOFA scores in cancer patients with sepsis, and also to determine if the addition of hyperlactatemia to qSOFA increases the accuracy in predicting the 30-day mortality. MATERIAL AND

methodWe consecutively included adult active cancer patients (age ≥ 18 years) with sepsis defined by SIRS who visited the emergency department (ED) from May 1st to July 30th, 2017. Data were collected retrospectively through reviewing medical records. The SOFA and qSOFA scores were calculated with the initial variables at the time of ED admission. The primary endpoint was 30-day mortality.

resultOf 1137 screened, 301 were included. The 30-day mortality was 14.3% (43 patients). Among the total 301, the SOFA score was ≥ 2 in 168 and qSOFA ≥ 2 in 23. For those with SOFA ≥ 2 and < 2, the mortality was 23.2% and 3%, respectively (P < 0.001). For those with qSOFA ≥ 2 and < 2, the mortality was 47.8% and 11.5%, respectively (P < 0.001). The AUROC of 30-day mortality for qSOFA was lower than that for SOFA (0.66 (95% CI, 0.56-0.75) vs. 0.79 (95% CI, 0.72-0.87), P = 0.004)). However, the combination of qSOFA with lactate ≥ 2 threshold considerably enhanced a discrimination capacity for mortality with an AUROC 0.77 (95% CI, 0.69-0.85), which was similar to SOFA (P = 0.11).

conclusionIn cancer patients with sepsis, qSOFA was inferior to SOFA in predicting mortality. However, adding lactate to qSOFA resulted in greater prognostic accuracy for short-term mortality, comparable with SOFA.

Indexed as

FemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsOrgan Dysfunction ScoresPrognosisRetrospective StudiesSepsisSystemic Inflammatory Response SyndromeCancerMortalitySepsis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.