Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31119369›Full record

ReviewRheumatology international2019

Conventional radiography of the hands and wrists in rheumatoid arthritis. What a rheumatologist should know and how to interpret the radiological findings.

Alexandros A Drosos, Eleftherios Pelechas, Paraskevi V Voulgari

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Rheumatology international, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Computed tomography-current status and future directions for arthritis imaging.Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Surgical Treatment of Hand and Foot Gout Stone and Influence Factors on Prognosis.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alexandros A DrososRheumatology Clinic, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical School, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, 45110, Greece. adrosos@cc.uoi.gr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2232-0326
Eleftherios PelechasRheumatology Clinic, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical School, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, 45110, Greece.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9383-5722
Paraskevi V VoulgariRheumatology Clinic, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical School, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, 45110, Greece.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5193-2284
University of Ioannina · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic inflammatory disease affecting the synovial membrane, leading to joint damage and bone destruction. Conventional radiography (CR) of the hands and wrists has been, for many years, the primary imaging modality used to diagnose and monitor RA. On the other hand, many investigators in clinical trials and observational studies used CR of the hands and wrists to demonstrate drug effectiveness and structural damage progression. The purpose of this review is to discuss the evaluation and interpretation of the hands and wrists by CR in RA patients and the radiographic changes occurring in a specific joint. Thus, the literature was reviewed until January 2019 for studies regarding RA radiological evaluation of the hands and wrists, as well as radiological progression using CR. The assessment of joint pathology in RA patients should begin with CR which is the best imaging modality to evaluate any subtle changes occurring at the bone level. Once high-quality radiographs are obtained in appropriate views/projections, then an accurate evaluation can often be made without any further imaging studies. Therefore, CR is a valuable tool for RA screening. It is an easy-to-perform technique and gives important information assisting in differentiating between RA from other arthritides. In contrary CR does not provide good information when early RA changes start to appear, such as synovial inflammation or other soft-tissue structural changes. Nevertheless, it still remains the most commonly used imaging tool in rheumatology and has a number of advantages: it is easily available in most rheumatologists and readily accessible in most patients. It is inexpensive and relatively safe. It provides immediate information and can be interpreted easily by the requested rheumatologist. Finally, the data are reproducible and can be used for serial evaluation and follow-up.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeArthritis, RheumatoidAttitude of Health PersonnelDiagnosis, DifferentialHand JointsHumansPredictive Value of TestsPrognosisReproducibility of ResultsRheumatologistsSeverity of Illness IndexWrist JointInflammationRadiographyRheumatoid arthritisSynovial membraneWrist

Identifiers

PMID31119369
OpenAlexW2944886816

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.