ReviewRheumatology international2019
Conventional radiography of the hands and wrists in rheumatoid arthritis. What a rheumatologist should know and how to interpret the radiological findings.
Review in Rheumatology international, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Application of an advanced noise reduction algorithm for imaging of hands in rheumatic diseases: evaluation of image quality compared to standard-dose images.Rheumatology international · 2020Trial
- Radiographic Bone Texture Analysis using Deep Learning Models for Early Rheumatoid Arthritis Diagnosis.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Clinical Impact of Multiparametric Contrast-Enhanced Dual-Energy Computed Tomography in Arthritis Imaging: A Prospective Single-Center Study.Arthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2025Article
- Research progress on complications of rheumatoid arthritis.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Computed tomography-current status and future directions for arthritis imaging.Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease · 2024Review
- Together or Separate: What is best practice when imaging bilateral hands for rheumatoid arthritis examinations?Journal of medical radiation sciences · 2023Article
- Deep learning-based automatic-bone-destruction-evaluation system using contextual information from other joints.Arthritis research & therapy · 2022Article
- A Patient with Symmetrical Polyarthritis. The Value of Conventional Radiography for a Correct Diagnosis.Rheumatology and therapy · 2022Article
- Seronegative Erosive Arthritis Following SARS-CoV-2 Infection.Rheumatology and therapy · 2022Article
- Article
- Surgical Treatment of Hand and Foot Gout Stone and Influence Factors on Prognosis.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022Article
- A not-to-miss Cause of Severe Cervical Spine Pain in a Patient with Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Case-Based Review.Mediterranean journal of rheumatology · 2021Article
- Radiological Findings of the Cervical Spine in Rheumatoid Arthritis: What a Rheumatologist Should Know.Current rheumatology reports · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic inflammatory disease affecting the synovial membrane, leading to joint damage and bone destruction. Conventional radiography (CR) of the hands and wrists has been, for many years, the primary imaging modality used to diagnose and monitor RA. On the other hand, many investigators in clinical trials and observational studies used CR of the hands and wrists to demonstrate drug effectiveness and structural damage progression. The purpose of this review is to discuss the evaluation and interpretation of the hands and wrists by CR in RA patients and the radiographic changes occurring in a specific joint. Thus, the literature was reviewed until January 2019 for studies regarding RA radiological evaluation of the hands and wrists, as well as radiological progression using CR. The assessment of joint pathology in RA patients should begin with CR which is the best imaging modality to evaluate any subtle changes occurring at the bone level. Once high-quality radiographs are obtained in appropriate views/projections, then an accurate evaluation can often be made without any further imaging studies. Therefore, CR is a valuable tool for RA screening. It is an easy-to-perform technique and gives important information assisting in differentiating between RA from other arthritides. In contrary CR does not provide good information when early RA changes start to appear, such as synovial inflammation or other soft-tissue structural changes. Nevertheless, it still remains the most commonly used imaging tool in rheumatology and has a number of advantages: it is easily available in most rheumatologists and readily accessible in most patients. It is inexpensive and relatively safe. It provides immediate information and can be interpreted easily by the requested rheumatologist. Finally, the data are reproducible and can be used for serial evaluation and follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.