Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31119308›Full record

ReviewSocial psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology2020

The economic costs of loneliness: a review of cost-of-illness and economic evaluation studies.

Cathrine Mihalopoulos, Long Khanh-Dao Le, Mary Lou Chatterton, Jessica Bucholc, Julianne Holt-Lunstad, Michelle H Lim, Lidia Engel

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 54 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. [Internet-based self-help for loneliness-a systematic review].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2024
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Multidimensional Loneliness Among University Students: A Latent Profile Approach.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  13. Review
  14. The societal cost of 'unwanted' loneliness in Spain.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Researching gender and loneliness differently.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2025
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Cathrine MihalopoulosDeakin University, Locked Bag 20001, Geelong, VIC, 3220, Australia. cathy.mihalopoulos@deakin.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7127-9462
Long Khanh-Dao LeDeakin University, Locked Bag 20001, Geelong, VIC, 3220, Australia.
Mary Lou ChattertonDeakin University, Locked Bag 20001, Geelong, VIC, 3220, Australia.
Jessica BucholcDeakin University, Locked Bag 20001, Geelong, VIC, 3220, Australia.
Julianne Holt-LunstadPsychology Department, Brigham Young University, 1001 KMBL, Provo, UT, 84602, USA.
Michelle H LimCentre for Mental Health, Iverson Health Innovation Institute, Swinburne University of Technology, Level 10, ATC Building, Hawthorn, VIC, 3122, Australia.
Lidia EngelDeakin University, Locked Bag 20001, Geelong, VIC, 3220, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeLoneliness and social isolation can occur at all stages of the life course and are recognized as a global health priority. The aim of this study was to review existing literature on the economic costs associated with loneliness and social isolation as well as evidence on the cost-effectiveness of interventions to prevent or address loneliness and social isolation.

methodsA bibliographic database search was undertaken in Medline, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and Embase, supplemented by a grey literature search and a reference list search. Papers were included that were published in English language in peer-reviewed literature in the past 10 years, reporting costs of loneliness and/or social isolation or economic evaluations of interventions whose primary purpose is to reduce loneliness and/or social isolation, including return on investment (ROI) or social return on investment (SROI) studies.

resultsIn total, 12 papers were included in this review, consisting of four cost-of-illness studies, seven economic evaluations and five ROI or SROI studies. Most studies were conducted in the UK and focused on older adults. Due to the inconsistent use of the terms loneliness and social isolation, as well as their measurement, the true economic burden can only be estimated to a certain extent and the comparability across economic evaluations and ROI studies is limited.

conclusionsThe paucity of evidence that is available primarily evaluating the economic costs of loneliness indicates that more research is needed to assess the economic burden and identify cost-effective interventions to prevent or address loneliness and social isolation.

Indexed as

Cost of IllnessLonelinessSocial IsolationAdultAgedCost-Benefit AnalysisFemaleHumansMaleMental DisordersMiddle AgedCost–benefit analysisCost of illnessCosts and cost analysisLonelinessReturn on investmentSocial isolation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.