Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31119215›Full record

ArticleWater research X2019

Comparing the anti-bacterial performance of chlorination and electrolysis post-treatments in a hand washing water recycling system.

Christopher Ziemba, Odile Larive, Svenja Deck, Theo Huisman, Eberhard Morgenroth

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Water research X, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Technologies for pollutant removal and resource recovery from blackwater: a review.Frontiers of environmental science & engineering · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Christopher ZiembaEawag: Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, 8600, Dubendorf, Switzerland.
Odile LariveEawag: Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, 8600, Dubendorf, Switzerland.
Svenja DeckEawag: Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, 8600, Dubendorf, Switzerland.
Theo HuismanEawag: Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, 8600, Dubendorf, Switzerland.
Eberhard MorgenrothEawag: Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, 8600, Dubendorf, Switzerland.
ETH Zurich · CHSwiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Innovative solutions are necessary to enable the decentralized recycling of greywater for applications requiring high-quality water, such as hand washing. While physical barriers such as ultrafiltration membranes effectively prevent the passage of bacteria, and chemical and biological treatments can effectively reduce the carbon content of the treated water, there exists a knowledge gap regarding the application of anti-bacterial strategies to prevent the growth of harmful bacteria following treatment. In this study, the effluent water from a household-scale greywater treatment system was fed to seven parallel experimental post-treatment tanks: three receiving direct chlorination with free chlorine residuals of 0.2, 1 or 5 mg Cl

Indexed as

Assimilable organic carbon (AOC)Biologically activated membrane bioreactor (BAMBi)DecentralizedGreywaterHydroxyl radicalRegrowth

Identifiers

PMID31119215
PMCPMC6510329
OpenAlexW2905276680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.