Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31119206›Full record

ArticleJNCI cancer spectrum2019

Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial of Omega-3 Fatty Acids Versus Omega-6 Fatty Acids for the Control of Cancer-Related Fatigue Among Breast Cancer Survivors.

Luke J Peppone, Julia E Inglis, Karen M Mustian, Charles E Heckler, Gilbert D A Padula, Supriya G Mohile, Charles S Kamen, Eva Culakova, Po-Ju Lin, Sarah L Kerns and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JNCI cancer spectrum, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Management of Fatigue in Adult Survivors of Cancer: ASCO-Society for Integrative Oncology Guideline Update.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2024
    Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Luke J PepponeDepartment of Surgery, University of Rochester Medical Center (URMC), Rochester, NY.
Julia E InglisDepartment of Surgery, University of Rochester Medical Center (URMC), Rochester, NY.
Karen M MustianDepartment of Surgery, University of Rochester Medical Center (URMC), Rochester, NY.
Charles E HecklerDepartment of Surgery, University of Rochester Medical Center (URMC), Rochester, NY.
Gilbert D A PadulaCancer Research Consortium of West Michigan, Grand Rapids, MI, URMC, Rochester, NY.
Supriya G MohileDepartment of Medicine, URMC, Rochester, NY.
Charles S KamenDepartment of Surgery, University of Rochester Medical Center (URMC), Rochester, NY.
Eva CulakovaDepartment of Surgery, University of Rochester Medical Center (URMC), Rochester, NY.
Po-Ju LinDepartment of Surgery, University of Rochester Medical Center (URMC), Rochester, NY.
Sarah L KernsDepartment of Radiation Oncology, URMC, Rochester, NY.
Sharon ColeDayton Clinical Oncology Program, Dayton, OH.
Michelle C JanelsinsDepartment of Surgery, University of Rochester Medical Center (URMC), Rochester, NY.
University of Rochester Medical Center · USDayton Clinical Oncology Program · USMichigan Cancer Research Consortium · US

Funding

URCC NCORP Research BaseUG1CA189961 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI Michelle C Janelsins, KAREN M. MUSTIAN · 2014 to 2026
$67.7M
Cancer Control Research Training Curriculum (R25T)R25CA102618 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI JANELSINS, MICHELLE C, MORROW, GARY R · 2004 to 2018
$6.7M
Clinical and Translational Cancer Control Research Training ProgramT32CA102618 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI Michelle C Janelsins, Gary R Morrow · 2019 to 2026
$2.7M
Clinical and Translational Approaches to Cognitive Impairments in CancerDP2CA195765 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI JANELSINS, MICHELLE C · 2014 to 2014
$2.3M
A Patient-Oriented Research Program in Geriatric OncologyK24AG056589 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI Supriya G. Mohile · 2018 to 2026
$1.5M
Risk Prediction for Development of Adverse Effects FOllowing Radiotherapy for Prostate CancerK07CA187546 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI KERNS, SARAH L. · 2015 to 2019
$649k
NCI NIH HHS DP2 CA195765NCI NIH HHS K07 CA187546NCI NIH HHS R25 CA102618NCI NIH HHS T32 CA102618NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA189961NIA NIH HHS K24 AG056589
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCancer-related fatigue (CRF) is a common side effect of adjuvant therapy and becomes a chronic problem for approximately one-third of survivors. Omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (O3-PUFA) demonstrated preliminary antifatigue effects in previous research, but have not been investigated in fatigued cancer survivors.

methodsBreast cancer survivors 4-36 months posttreatment with a CRF score of 4 or more of 10 using the symptom inventory (SI) were randomly assigned to O3-PUFA (fish oil, 6 g/d), omega-6 PUFA (O6-PUFA; soybean oil, 6 g/d), or a low-dose combination of O3-/O6-PUFA (3 g/d O3-PUFA and O6-PUFA) for 6 weeks. CRF was assessed by the SI (screening question), the Brief Fatigue Inventory, and the Multidimensional Fatigue Symptom Index. Protein and mRNA levels of inflammatory and antioxidant biomarkers, along with fatty acid and lipid levels, were assessed at baseline and week 6. Statistical tests were two-sided.

resultsA total of 108 breast cancer survivors consented; 97 subjects were randomly assigned and 81 completed the trial. The SI CRF score decreased by 2.51 points at week 6 with O6-PUFA and by 0.93 points with O3-PUFA, with statistically significant between-group difference (effect size = -0.86,

conclusionContrary to our original hypothesis, O6-PUFA statistically significantly reduced CRF compared with O3-PUFA. Further research is needed to confirm these findings and to elucidate mechanisms of action.

Identifiers

PMID31119206
PMCPMC6512349
OpenAlexW2917717883

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.