Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31119097›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in oncology2019

NAMPT as a Dedifferentiation-Inducer Gene: NAD

Antonio Lucena-Cacace, Masayuki Umeda, Lola E Navas, Amancio Carnero

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. A Darwinian Perspective on Tumor Evolution.International journal of biological sciences · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. NAD pool as an antitumor target against cancer stem cells in head and neck cancer.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2023
    Article
  14. Targeting NADFrontiers in immunology · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Two Faces of Autophagy in the Struggle against Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Antonio Lucena-CacaceDepartment of Cell Growth and Differentiation, Center for iPS Cell Research and Application, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Masayuki UmedaDepartment of Cell Growth and Differentiation, Center for iPS Cell Research and Application, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Lola E NavasCIBERONC, ISCIII, Madrid, Spain.
Amancio CarneroCIBERONC, ISCIII, Madrid, Spain.
Kyoto University · JPInstituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla · ESUniversidad de Sevilla · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glioma Cancer Stem-Like Cells (GSCs) are a small subset of CD133

Indexed as

GBMGliomaGSCsNADNAMPTPARPSIRTTMZ

Identifiers

PMID31119097
PMCPMC6507617
OpenAlexW2943378083

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.