ArticleHealthcare technology letters2019
Detection and localisation of hesitant steps in people with Alzheimer's disease navigating routes of varying complexity.
Article in Healthcare technology letters, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sensor-based motion analysis for dementia detection: a systematic review.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Review
- Effects of Route Complexity and Lighting on Route Following in Alzheimer's Disease and Posterior Cortical Atrophy.Brain sciences · 2024Article
- Behavioral Disorders of Spatial Cognition in Patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment due to Alzheimer's Disease: Preliminary Findings from the BDSC-MCI Project.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Diagnosis and Management of Posterior Cortical Atrophy.Current treatment options in neurology · 2023Review
- Predicting real world spatial disorientation in Alzheimer's disease patients using virtual reality navigation tests.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Effects of lighting variability on locomotion in posterior cortical atrophy.Alzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
People with Alzheimer's disease (AD) have characteristic problems navigating everyday environments. While patients may exhibit abnormal gait parameters, adaptive gait irregularities when navigating environments are little explored or understood. The aim of this study was to assess adaptive locomotor responses of AD subjects in a complex environment requiring spatial navigation. A controlled environment of three corridors was set up: straight (I), U-shaped (U) and dog-leg (S). Participants were asked to walk along corridors as part of a counterbalanced repeated-measures design. Three groups were studied: 11 people with posterior cortical atrophy (PCA), 10 with typical Alzheimer's disease (tAD) and 13 controls. Spatio-temporal gait parameters and position within the corridors were monitored with shoe-mounted inertial measurement units (IMUs). Hesitant steps were identified from statistical analysis of the distribution of step time data. Walking paths were generated from position data calculated by double integration of IMU acceleration. People with PCA and tAD had similar gait characteristics, having shorter steps and longer step times than controls. Hesitant steps tended to be clustered within certain regions of the walking paths. IMUs enabled identification of key gait characteristics in this clinical population (step time, length and step hesitancy) and environmental conditions (route complexity) modifying their expression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.