Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31119032›Full record

ArticleF1000Research2019

A Bioconductor workflow for the Bayesian analysis of spatial proteomics.

Oliver M Crook, Lisa M Breckels, Kathryn S Lilley, Paul D W Kirk, Laurent Gatto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in F1000Research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Subcellular proteomics.Nature reviews. Methods primers · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Oliver M CrookCambridge Centre for Proteomics, Department of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 1QR, UK.
Lisa M BreckelsCambridge Centre for Proteomics, Department of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 1QR, UK.
Kathryn S LilleyCambridge Centre for Proteomics, Department of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 1QR, UK.
Paul D W KirkMRC Biostatistics Unit, Cambridge Institute for Public Health, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0SR, UK.
Laurent GattoUniversité catholique de Louvain, Brussels, 1200, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-1520-2268

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/N023129/1Medical Research Council MC_UU_00002/10Medical Research Council MC_UU_00002/13Wellcome Trust 108441/Z/15/ZWellcome Trust 110170/Z/15/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Knowledge of the subcellular location of a protein gives valuable insight into its function. The field of spatial proteomics has become increasingly popular due to improved multiplexing capabilities in high-throughput mass spectrometry, which have made it possible to systematically localise thousands of proteins per experiment. In parallel with these experimental advances, improved methods for analysing spatial proteomics data have also been developed. In this workflow, we demonstrate using `pRoloc` for the Bayesian analysis of spatial proteomics data. We detail the software infrastructure and then provide step-by-step guidance of the analysis, including setting up a pipeline, assessing convergence, and interpreting downstream results. In several places we provide additional details on Bayesian analysis to provide users with a holistic view of Bayesian analysis for spatial proteomics data.

Indexed as

Bayes TheoremProteomicsWorkflowMass SpectrometrySoftwareBayesianBioconductormachine learningpRolocpRolocdataproteomicssoftwarespatial proteomics

Identifiers

PMID31119032
PMCPMC6509962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.