ArticleWideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques2019
Laparoscopic adrenalectomy: lateral transperitoneal versus posterior retroperitoneal approach - prospective randomized trial.
Article in Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparing surgical outcomes of approaches to adrenalectomy - a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2023Pooled it
- Posterior Retroperitoneoscopic Versus Laparoscopic Transperitoneal Adrenalectomy: A Systematic Review by an Updated Meta-Analysis.World journal of surgery · 2021Pooled it
- Open versus laparoscopic adrenalectomy and comparison of laparoscopic approaches for adrenocortical carcinoma.BMC cancer · 2026Article
- Modified versus three-level technique of retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy for all patients with adrenal lesions ≤ 6cm: a retrospective, case-controlled study.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2024Article
- Efficacy and safety of laparoendoscopic single-site adrenalectomy versus conventional laparoscopic adrenalectomy: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2022Article
- Synchronized Laparoscopic Bilateral Adrenalectomy for Pheochromocytoma in Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Syndrome: A Case Report.Journal of kidney cancer and VHL · 2022Article
- Robotic Posterior Retroperitoneal Adrenalectomy: Patient Selection and Long-Term Outcomes.Annals of surgical oncology · 2021Article
- Comparison of Posterior Retroperitoneoscopic Adrenalectomy Versus Lateral Transperitoneal Laparoscopic Adrenalectomy for Adrenal Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Article
- Modified three-level techniques of retroperitoneal laparoscopic procedures to treat adrenal lesions for patients with BMI ≥ 25 Kg/mInternational journal of medical sciences · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionLaparoscopic adrenalectomy has become the gold standard of surgical treatment for benign adrenal masses. Two alternative surgical approaches are currently advocated: the lateral transperitoneal approach (LTA) and the posterior retroperitoneal approach (PRA). Several randomized trials have compared LTA to PRA, but most of them included small numbers of patients or had stringent inclusion criteria.
aimTo compare clinical results of LTA and PRA endoscopic adrenalectomies for tumors < 8 cm with wide inclusion criteria. MATERIAL AND
methodsWe randomized 77 patients to either LTA (n = 33) or PRA (n = 44). The groups were comparable in terms of age, gender proportions, body mass index, tumor size, clinical and pathological diagnosis. We analyzed duration of surgery, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative pain, length of hospital stay and postoperative morbidity.
resultsThe follow-up concerned 98.8% of patients and was on average 28 (8-47) months long. There were no conversions. We identified significantly lower intensity of pain assessed 24 h after surgery in the PRA group (3.4 ±1), as compared to LTA (4.2 ±1), with lower prevalence of shoulder pain (2.3% vs. 30.3%, respectively). Postoperative hospital stay was shorter in the PRA (1.14 ±0.4) than in the LTA (1.36 ±0.5) group. Perioperative morbidity concerned 4 patients in each group with pain requiring oral analgesia > 7 days.
conclusionsTo our knowledge this is the largest prospective randomized study comparing LTA to PRA. We demonstrated safety, efficacy and very low morbidity of both techniques. The PRA proved superior to LTA in terms of lower intensity of postoperative pain and shorter hospital stay.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.