Microvascular stasis and hemolysis: coincidence or causality?

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

1. The resurgence of whole blood transfusion: Evaluating microcirculatory evidence in hemorrhagic trauma care: A review.Transfusion and apheresis science : official journal of the World Apheresis Association : official journal of the European Society for Haemapheresis · 2026
   Review
2. Critical Role of Hemopexin Mediated Cytoprotection in the Pathophysiology of Sickle Cell Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
   Review
3. Thrombotic Complications in Patients with Immune-Mediated Hemolysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021
   Review
4. Linking Labile Heme with Thrombosis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021
   Review
5. Mechanisms of Hemolysis During Sepsis.Inflammation · 2018
   Review

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.