Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31118559›Full record

ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2019

Systemic exposure to intracameral vs topical mydriatic agents: in cataract surgery.

Jose Guell, Anders Behndig, Uwe Pleyer, Stéphane Jaulerry, Pascal Rozot, Pierre-Jean Pisella, Pierre-Yves Robert, Ines Lanzl, Sayeh Pourjavan, Carlos Aguiar and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pharmacologic interventions for mydriasis in cataract surgery.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 14 institutions in 8 countries.

Jose GuellCornea and Refractive Surgery Unit, Instituto de Microcirugía Ocular, Barcelona, Spain, guell@imo.es.
Anders BehndigDepartment of Clinical Science/Ophthalmology, Umeå University Hospital, Umeå, Sweden.
Uwe PleyerUniversitäts-Augenklinik, Charité Campus Virchow-Klinik, Berlin, Germany.
Stéphane JaulerryCentre Hospitalier de Bigorre, Tarbes, France.
Pascal RozotClinique Monticelli, Marseille, France.
Pierre-Jean PisellaHôpital Bretonneau, CHRU de Tours, Tours, France.
Pierre-Yves RobertHôpital Dupuytren, CHU de Limoges, Limoges, France.
Ines LanzlChiemsee Augen Tagesklinik, Prien, Germany.
Sayeh PourjavanCliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Bruxelles, Belgium.
Carlos AguiarHospital de Santo Antonio, Porto, Portugal.
Joaquin FernandezHospital Torrecárdenas, Almeria, Spain.
Gunther GrabnerUniversitätsklinik Für Augenheilkunde Und Optometrie, Der Paracelsus, Austria.
Rita MencucciAOU Careggi, Clinica Oculistica, Università Degli Studi di Firenze, Firenze, Italy.
Frédéric ChiambarettaHôpital Gabriel Montpied, CHU de Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Marc LabetoulleHôpital Bicêtre, Université Paris Sud, Paris, France.
Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi · ITCentre Hospitalier de Bigorre · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Clermont-Ferrand · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Limoges · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Tours · FRCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DECliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc · BEComplejo Hospitalario Torrecárdenas · ESHospital de Santo António · PTInstituto de Microcirugía Ocular · ESOrtenau Klinikum · DEUmeå University · SEUniversitätsklinik für Augenheilkunde · CHUniversité Paris-Sud · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe objective of this study was to compare systemic exposure to tropicamide/phenylephrine following intracameral or topical administration before cataract surgery. PATIENTS AND

methodsMydriatics exposure was calculated in patients randomized to intracameral fixed combination of mydriatics and anesthetic ([ICMA]: tropicamide 0.02%, phenylephrine 0.31%, and lidocaine 1%, N=271) or mydriatic eye drops ([EDs]: tropicamide 0.5% and phenylephrine 10%, N=283). Additional doses were permitted if required. Mydriatic plasma levels were determined by mass spectrometric HPLC in 15 patients per group before and after administration.

resultsMost ICMA patients (73.6%) received a single dose (200 µL) representing an exposure to tropicamide of 0.04 mg and phenylephrine of 0.62 mg. None of these patients received additional mydriatics. In the control group (three administrations), the exposure was 0.45 (11.3-fold higher than ICMA) and 10.2 (16.5-fold higher) mg. When additional ED was used in this group (9.2% of patients), it was 37.5-fold higher for tropicamide (10 drops, 1.5 mg) and 54.8-fold higher for phenylephrine (10 drops, 34 mg) than the recommended ICMA dose. Tropicamide plasma levels were not detectable at any time point in ICMA patients while it was detectable in all ED patients at 12 and 30 minutes. Phenylephrine was detectable in 14.3% of ICMA patients compared to all ED patients at least at one time point. More ED patients experienced a meaningful increase in blood pressure and/or heart rate (11.2% vs 6.0% of ICMA patients;

conclusionSystemic exposure to tropicamide/phenylephrine was lower and cardiovascular (CV) effects were less frequent with ICMA. This could be of particular significance in patients at CV risk.

Indexed as

cardiovascular safetycataract surgeryintracameral mydriasissystemic influencetopical mydriasis

Identifiers

PMID31118559
PMCPMC6501990
OpenAlexW2943739626

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.