Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31118284›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2019

Experimental evidence on promotion of electric and improved biomass cookstoves.

S K Pattanayak, M Jeuland, J J Lewis, F Usmani, N Brooks, V Bhojvaid, A Kar, L Lipinski, L Morrison, O Patange and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The use and impacts of an ethanol cooking fuel promotion pilot in Dar es Salaam.Energy for sustainable development : the journal of the International Energy Initiative · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Breathing Room: Cleaner Fuels for Home Cooking in LMICs.Environmental health perspectives · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The Role of Education and Attitudes in Cooking Fuel Choice: Evidence from two states in India.Energy for sustainable development : the journal of the International Energy Initiative · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

S K PattanayakSanford School of Public Policy, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708; subhrendu.pattanayak@duke.edu.
M JeulandSanford School of Public Policy, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708.ORCID 0000-0001-8325-2622
J J LewisNicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708.
F UsmaniSanford School of Public Policy, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708.
N BrooksSchool of Earth, Energy & Environmental Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305.
V BhojvaidDepartment of Sociology, University of Delhi, New Delhi 110007, India.
A KarInstitute for Resources, Environment and Sustainability, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada.
L LipinskiDuke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC 27710.
L MorrisonCenter for Environmental, Technology, and Energy Economics, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709.
O PatangePublic Systems Group, Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, Ahmedabad 380015, India.
N RamanathanNexleaf Analytics, Los Angeles, CA 90064.
I H RehmanSocial Transformation Division, The Energy and Resources Institute, New Delhi 110003, India.
R ThadaniCenter for Ecology, Development and Research, Dehradun 248006, India.
M VoraIndependent consultant, Jaipur 302001, India.
V RamanathanScripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Improved cookstoves (ICS) can deliver "triple wins" by improving household health, local environments, and global climate. Yet their potential is in doubt because of low and slow diffusion, likely because of constraints imposed by differences in culture, geography, institutions, and missing markets. We offer insights about this challenge based on a multiyear, multiphase study with nearly 1,000 households in the Indian Himalayas. In phase I, we combined desk reviews, simulations, and focus groups to diagnose barriers to ICS adoption. In phase II, we implemented a set of pilots to simulate a mature market and designed an intervention that upgraded the supply chain (combining marketing and home delivery), provided rebates and financing to lower income and liquidity constraints, and allowed households a choice among ICS. In phase III, we used findings from these pilots to implement a field experiment to rigorously test whether this combination of upgraded supply and demand promotion stimulates adoption. The experiment showed that, compared with zero purchase in control villages, over half of intervention households bought an ICS, although demand was highly price-sensitive. Demand was at least twice as high for electric stoves relative to biomass ICS. Even among households that received a negligible price discount, the upgraded supply chain alone induced a 28 percentage-point increase in ICS ownership. Although the bundled intervention is resource-intensive, the full costs are lower than the social benefits of ICS promotion. Our findings suggest that market analysis, robust supply chains, and price discounts are critical for ICS diffusion.

Indexed as

improved cookstovesIndian Himalayasprice subsidiessupply chaintechnology adoption

Identifiers

PMID31118284
PMCPMC6612920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.